Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform

Uncertainty evaluation plays an important role in ensuring that a designed system can indeed achieve its desired performance. There are three standard methods to evaluate the propagation of uncertainty: 1) analytic linear approximation; 2) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation; and 3) analytical methods using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arvind Rajan, Melanie Po-Leen Ooi, Ye Chow Kuang, Serge N. Demidenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2015-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7064781/
id doaj-13a542b0ece045a085ed5740f8b01168
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13a542b0ece045a085ed5740f8b011682021-03-29T19:32:41ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362015-01-01320922210.1109/ACCESS.2015.24155927064781Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin TransformArvind Rajan0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-5007Melanie Po-Leen Ooi1Ye Chow Kuang2Serge N. Demidenko3Department of Electrical and Computer Systems EngineeringSchool of Engineering, Advanced Engineering Platform, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Systems EngineeringSchool of Engineering, Advanced Engineering Platform, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Systems EngineeringSchool of Engineering, Advanced Engineering Platform, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, MalaysiaSchool of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandUncertainty evaluation plays an important role in ensuring that a designed system can indeed achieve its desired performance. There are three standard methods to evaluate the propagation of uncertainty: 1) analytic linear approximation; 2) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation; and 3) analytical methods using mathematical representation of the probability density function (pdf). The analytic linear approximation method is inaccurate for highly nonlinear systems, which limits its application. The MC simulation approach is the most widely used technique, as it is accurate, versatile, and applicable to highly nonlinear systems. However, it does not define the uncertainty of the output in terms of those of its inputs. Therefore, designers who use this method need to resimulate their systems repeatedly for different combinations of input parameters. The most accurate solution can be attained using the analytical method based on pdf. However, it is unfortunately too complex to employ. This paper introduces the use of an analytical standard uncertainty evaluation (ASUE) toolbox that automatically performs the analytical method for multivariate polynomial systems. The backbone of the toolbox is a proposed ASUE framework. This framework enables the analytical process to be automated by replacing the complex mathematical steps in the analytical method with a Mellin transform lookup table and a set of algebraic operations. The ASUE toolbox was specifically designed for engineers and designers and is, therefore, simple to use. It provides the exact solution obtainable using the MC simulation, but with an additional output uncertainty expression as a function of its input parameters. This paper goes on to show how this expression can be used to prevent overdesign and/or suboptimal design solutions. The ASUE framework and toolbox substantially extend current analytical techniques to a much wider range of applications.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7064781/Analytical Standard Uncertainty EvaluationMellin TransformMultivariate Polynomial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arvind Rajan
Melanie Po-Leen Ooi
Ye Chow Kuang
Serge N. Demidenko
spellingShingle Arvind Rajan
Melanie Po-Leen Ooi
Ye Chow Kuang
Serge N. Demidenko
Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
IEEE Access
Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation
Mellin Transform
Multivariate Polynomial
author_facet Arvind Rajan
Melanie Po-Leen Ooi
Ye Chow Kuang
Serge N. Demidenko
author_sort Arvind Rajan
title Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
title_short Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
title_full Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
title_fullStr Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation Using Mellin Transform
title_sort analytical standard uncertainty evaluation using mellin transform
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Uncertainty evaluation plays an important role in ensuring that a designed system can indeed achieve its desired performance. There are three standard methods to evaluate the propagation of uncertainty: 1) analytic linear approximation; 2) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation; and 3) analytical methods using mathematical representation of the probability density function (pdf). The analytic linear approximation method is inaccurate for highly nonlinear systems, which limits its application. The MC simulation approach is the most widely used technique, as it is accurate, versatile, and applicable to highly nonlinear systems. However, it does not define the uncertainty of the output in terms of those of its inputs. Therefore, designers who use this method need to resimulate their systems repeatedly for different combinations of input parameters. The most accurate solution can be attained using the analytical method based on pdf. However, it is unfortunately too complex to employ. This paper introduces the use of an analytical standard uncertainty evaluation (ASUE) toolbox that automatically performs the analytical method for multivariate polynomial systems. The backbone of the toolbox is a proposed ASUE framework. This framework enables the analytical process to be automated by replacing the complex mathematical steps in the analytical method with a Mellin transform lookup table and a set of algebraic operations. The ASUE toolbox was specifically designed for engineers and designers and is, therefore, simple to use. It provides the exact solution obtainable using the MC simulation, but with an additional output uncertainty expression as a function of its input parameters. This paper goes on to show how this expression can be used to prevent overdesign and/or suboptimal design solutions. The ASUE framework and toolbox substantially extend current analytical techniques to a much wider range of applications.
topic Analytical Standard Uncertainty Evaluation
Mellin Transform
Multivariate Polynomial
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7064781/
work_keys_str_mv AT arvindrajan analyticalstandarduncertaintyevaluationusingmellintransform
AT melaniepoleenooi analyticalstandarduncertaintyevaluationusingmellintransform
AT yechowkuang analyticalstandarduncertaintyevaluationusingmellintransform
AT sergendemidenko analyticalstandarduncertaintyevaluationusingmellintransform
_version_ 1724196009730375680