Development and External Validation of Safe Discharge Criteria After Radical Gastrectomy

• Main Authors: Yu D, Wu X, Li X, Liu X, Jiang K, Zhao Q, Nie H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-07-01
• Series: Cancer Management and Research
• Subjects: gastric cancer; radical gastrectomy; postoperative complications; safe discharge; perioperative management
• Online Access: https://www.dovepress.com/development-and-external-validation-of-safe-discharge-criteria-after-r-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CMAR
• ISSN: 1179-1322

Deliang Yu,1,&ast; Xiaoyong Wu,1,&ast; Xuzhao Li,1,&ast; Xiaonan Liu,1 Kun Jiang,2 Qingchuan Zhao,1 Huang Nie3 1Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710032, People’s Republic of China; 2Information Center, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710032, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qingchuan Zhao Tel [phone]Email [e-mail] Nie [phone]Email [e-mail]: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) gradually shortens the length of stay but increases the rate of unplanned readmission after discharge. Currently, objective discharge criteria for patients after radical gastrectomy is lacking. This study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram for estimation of the possibility of safe discharge on the fifth-day post radical gastrectomy.Methods: We enrolled 496 consecutive patients undergoing radical gastrectomy as the development cohort. After the fifth day of surgery, patients were assigned to the postoperative complication group and no postoperative complication group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for both groups. Then, we constructed the risk prediction model of postoperative severe complications (PSCs) and applied it to evaluate whether the patient could be discharged safely. The external validation cohort comprised 245 patients, whom we used to evaluate the capability of our model to predict the risk of PSCs. The primary measure was the negative predictive rate (NPR) and the area under the curve (AUC).Results: Through multivariate analysis, gender, maximum body temperature on the 4th postoperative day (POD4), oral intake and ambulatory duration on POD4, the proportion of neutrophils (≥ 75% or < 75%) and pain score (≥ 4 or < 4) on POD5, and defecation with 5 days after the procedure (yes or no) were identified as independent predictors for PSCs. Upon incorporation of these variables, the nomogram demonstrated a good NPR of 0.957 and 0.916 and AUC of 0.918 and 0.719 in the two cohorts, respectively. With a nomogram score of 110, patients were stratified into low and high risk of PSCs.Conclusion: The nomogram demonstrated good predictive potential for low-risk patients. It could serve as an objective safe discharge approach for patients after the fifth day of radical gastrectomy.Keywords: gastric cancer, radical gastrectomy, postoperative complications, safe discharge, perioperative management