Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Arist...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
Online Access: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989 |
id |
doaj-138655f4a76c47afa4d5d7a0cd1c528d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-138655f4a76c47afa4d5d7a0cd1c528d2021-06-24T15:53:06ZdeuUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Revista de Filosofia Antiga1981-94712021-05-0115110.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p207-260Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalhaMarco Zingano0Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Filosofia The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Aristotle argued that, to prevent determinism as the valid conclusion of the argument presented at the beginning of De interpretation 9, one has to deny the universal validity of the principle of bivalence; according to the other, Aristotle accepted the validity of the principle of bivalence, but averted the conclusion of determinism by introducing the notion of indefinite verum. Both answers are examined with a view to shedding some light on this chapter that has kindled so much discussion. https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marco Zingano |
spellingShingle |
Marco Zingano Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
author_facet |
Marco Zingano |
author_sort |
Marco Zingano |
title |
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
title_short |
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
title_full |
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
title_fullStr |
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
title_full_unstemmed |
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
title_sort |
futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha |
publisher |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
series |
Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
issn |
1981-9471 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Aristotle argued that, to prevent determinism as the valid conclusion of the argument presented at the beginning of De interpretation 9, one has to deny the universal validity of the principle of bivalence; according to the other, Aristotle accepted the validity of the principle of bivalence, but averted the conclusion of determinism by introducing the notion of indefinite verum. Both answers are examined with a view to shedding some light on this chapter that has kindled so much discussion.
|
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcozingano futuroscontingenteshistoriadeumaoutrabatalha |
_version_ |
1721361047220125696 |