Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha

The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Arist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco Zingano
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Universidade de São Paulo (USP) 2021-05-01
Series:Revista de Filosofia Antiga
Online Access:https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989
id doaj-138655f4a76c47afa4d5d7a0cd1c528d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-138655f4a76c47afa4d5d7a0cd1c528d2021-06-24T15:53:06ZdeuUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Revista de Filosofia Antiga1981-94712021-05-0115110.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i1p207-260Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalhaMarco Zingano0Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Filosofia The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Aristotle argued that, to prevent determinism as the valid conclusion of the argument presented at the beginning of De interpretation 9, one has to deny the universal validity of the principle of bivalence; according to the other, Aristotle accepted the validity of the principle of bivalence, but averted the conclusion of determinism by introducing the notion of indefinite verum. Both answers are examined with a view to shedding some light on this chapter that has kindled so much discussion. https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Zingano
spellingShingle Marco Zingano
Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
Revista de Filosofia Antiga
author_facet Marco Zingano
author_sort Marco Zingano
title Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
title_short Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
title_full Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
title_fullStr Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
title_full_unstemmed Futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
title_sort futuros contingentes: história de uma outra batalha
publisher Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
series Revista de Filosofia Antiga
issn 1981-9471
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The problem of future contingents is examined here through the vantage point of another controversy, the one over which answer Aristotle should be credited with. Two answers are attributed to Aristotle. According to the first one, which is nowadays often referred to as the traditional answer, Aristotle argued that, to prevent determinism as the valid conclusion of the argument presented at the beginning of De interpretation 9, one has to deny the universal validity of the principle of bivalence; according to the other, Aristotle accepted the validity of the principle of bivalence, but averted the conclusion of determinism by introducing the notion of indefinite verum. Both answers are examined with a view to shedding some light on this chapter that has kindled so much discussion.
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185989
work_keys_str_mv AT marcozingano futuroscontingenteshistoriadeumaoutrabatalha
_version_ 1721361047220125696