Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interactions between plants and beneficial soil organisms (e.g. rhizobial bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi) are models for investigating the ecological impacts of such associations in plant communities, and the evolution and maintenance of variation in mutualisms (e.g. host spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter H Thrall, Anna-Liisa Laine, Linda M Broadhurst, David J Bagnall, John Brockwell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3162553?pdf=render
id doaj-1369970f232245e6bc104dc65b6fd50e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1369970f232245e6bc104dc65b6fd50e2020-11-25T01:24:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0168e2354510.1371/journal.pone.0023545Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.Peter H ThrallAnna-Liisa LaineLinda M BroadhurstDavid J BagnallJohn BrockwellBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interactions between plants and beneficial soil organisms (e.g. rhizobial bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi) are models for investigating the ecological impacts of such associations in plant communities, and the evolution and maintenance of variation in mutualisms (e.g. host specificity and the level of benefits provided). With relatively few exceptions, variation in symbiotic effectiveness across wild host species is largely unexplored. METHODS: We evaluated these associations using representatives of several legume genera which commonly co-occur in natural ecosystems in south-eastern Australia and an extensive set of rhizobial strains isolated from these hosts. These strains had been previously assigned to specific phylotypes on the basis of molecular analyses. In the first of two inoculation experiments, the growth responses of each host species was evaluated with rhizobial strains isolated from that species. The second experiment assessed performance across genera and the extent of host specificity using a subset of these strains. RESULTS: While host growth responses to their own (sympatric) isolates varied considerably, rhizobial phylotype was a significant predictor of symbiotic performance, indicating that bacterial species designations on the basis of molecular markers have ecological importance. Hosts responded in qualitatively different ways to sympatric and allopatric strains of rhizobia, ranging from species with a clear preference for their own strains, to those that were broad generalists, through to species that grew significantly better with allopatric strains. CONCLUSION: Theory has focused on trade-offs between the provision of benefits and symbiont competitive ability that might explain the persistence of less beneficial strains. However, differences in performance among co-occurring host species could also drive such patterns. Our results thus highlight the likely importance of plant community structure in maintaining variation in symbiotic effectiveness.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3162553?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter H Thrall
Anna-Liisa Laine
Linda M Broadhurst
David J Bagnall
John Brockwell
spellingShingle Peter H Thrall
Anna-Liisa Laine
Linda M Broadhurst
David J Bagnall
John Brockwell
Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Peter H Thrall
Anna-Liisa Laine
Linda M Broadhurst
David J Bagnall
John Brockwell
author_sort Peter H Thrall
title Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
title_short Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
title_full Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
title_fullStr Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
title_full_unstemmed Symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native Australian legume genera.
title_sort symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobial mutualists varies in interactions with native australian legume genera.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interactions between plants and beneficial soil organisms (e.g. rhizobial bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi) are models for investigating the ecological impacts of such associations in plant communities, and the evolution and maintenance of variation in mutualisms (e.g. host specificity and the level of benefits provided). With relatively few exceptions, variation in symbiotic effectiveness across wild host species is largely unexplored. METHODS: We evaluated these associations using representatives of several legume genera which commonly co-occur in natural ecosystems in south-eastern Australia and an extensive set of rhizobial strains isolated from these hosts. These strains had been previously assigned to specific phylotypes on the basis of molecular analyses. In the first of two inoculation experiments, the growth responses of each host species was evaluated with rhizobial strains isolated from that species. The second experiment assessed performance across genera and the extent of host specificity using a subset of these strains. RESULTS: While host growth responses to their own (sympatric) isolates varied considerably, rhizobial phylotype was a significant predictor of symbiotic performance, indicating that bacterial species designations on the basis of molecular markers have ecological importance. Hosts responded in qualitatively different ways to sympatric and allopatric strains of rhizobia, ranging from species with a clear preference for their own strains, to those that were broad generalists, through to species that grew significantly better with allopatric strains. CONCLUSION: Theory has focused on trade-offs between the provision of benefits and symbiont competitive ability that might explain the persistence of less beneficial strains. However, differences in performance among co-occurring host species could also drive such patterns. Our results thus highlight the likely importance of plant community structure in maintaining variation in symbiotic effectiveness.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3162553?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT peterhthrall symbioticeffectivenessofrhizobialmutualistsvariesininteractionswithnativeaustralianlegumegenera
AT annaliisalaine symbioticeffectivenessofrhizobialmutualistsvariesininteractionswithnativeaustralianlegumegenera
AT lindambroadhurst symbioticeffectivenessofrhizobialmutualistsvariesininteractionswithnativeaustralianlegumegenera
AT davidjbagnall symbioticeffectivenessofrhizobialmutualistsvariesininteractionswithnativeaustralianlegumegenera
AT johnbrockwell symbioticeffectivenessofrhizobialmutualistsvariesininteractionswithnativeaustralianlegumegenera
_version_ 1725116619841077248