Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers

While multiple previous studies have proposed utilizing an ambient display for providing real-time posture feedback to seated computer workers, it is not well understood how effective ambient feedback is in supporting the users' dual task of computer work and posture monitoring/rectification. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoonjin Lee, Donghyun Beck, Woojin Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9292931/
id doaj-1355a53a93a147ffaae845cfe0e1eb53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1355a53a93a147ffaae845cfe0e1eb532021-03-30T03:42:25ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01822340522341710.1109/ACCESS.2020.30443169292931Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary WorkersYoonjin Lee0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6457-794XDonghyun Beck1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-8262Woojin Park2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5035-880XInterdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Safety Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, South KoreaDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Institute for Industrial Systems Innovation, Seoul National University, Seoul, South KoreaWhile multiple previous studies have proposed utilizing an ambient display for providing real-time posture feedback to seated computer workers, it is not well understood how effective ambient feedback is in supporting the users' dual task of computer work and posture monitoring/rectification. The objective of the current study was to evaluate an ambient display for real-time posture feedback in comparison with typical conditions, an on-screen display and no display condition, in terms of the dual task performance. The ambient and the on-screen display were also compared in terms of perceived detection efficiency and user acceptance measures. A total of 24 participants performed the dual task in each of the three display conditions (the ambient, on-screen and no display conditions). The dependent measures for the dual task performance were the number of typed answers and the occurrence rate of high-risk postures; and, for the subjective evaluation, two detection efficiency measures (visibility and understandability) and four user acceptance measures (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, attitude toward using technology and social influence) were employed. The study demonstrated that both the ambient and the on-screen displays enhanced the dual task performance with respect to the no-display condition and the ambient display was superior to the on-screen display in the subjective experience measures.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9292931/Ambient displaydual task performancemultiple resource theoryreal-time posture feedback systemsitting posture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoonjin Lee
Donghyun Beck
Woojin Park
spellingShingle Yoonjin Lee
Donghyun Beck
Woojin Park
Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
IEEE Access
Ambient display
dual task performance
multiple resource theory
real-time posture feedback system
sitting posture
author_facet Yoonjin Lee
Donghyun Beck
Woojin Park
author_sort Yoonjin Lee
title Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
title_short Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
title_full Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
title_fullStr Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
title_full_unstemmed Human Factors Evaluation of an Ambient Display for Real-Time Posture Feedback to Sedentary Workers
title_sort human factors evaluation of an ambient display for real-time posture feedback to sedentary workers
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2020-01-01
description While multiple previous studies have proposed utilizing an ambient display for providing real-time posture feedback to seated computer workers, it is not well understood how effective ambient feedback is in supporting the users' dual task of computer work and posture monitoring/rectification. The objective of the current study was to evaluate an ambient display for real-time posture feedback in comparison with typical conditions, an on-screen display and no display condition, in terms of the dual task performance. The ambient and the on-screen display were also compared in terms of perceived detection efficiency and user acceptance measures. A total of 24 participants performed the dual task in each of the three display conditions (the ambient, on-screen and no display conditions). The dependent measures for the dual task performance were the number of typed answers and the occurrence rate of high-risk postures; and, for the subjective evaluation, two detection efficiency measures (visibility and understandability) and four user acceptance measures (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, attitude toward using technology and social influence) were employed. The study demonstrated that both the ambient and the on-screen displays enhanced the dual task performance with respect to the no-display condition and the ambient display was superior to the on-screen display in the subjective experience measures.
topic Ambient display
dual task performance
multiple resource theory
real-time posture feedback system
sitting posture
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9292931/
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonjinlee humanfactorsevaluationofanambientdisplayforrealtimeposturefeedbacktosedentaryworkers
AT donghyunbeck humanfactorsevaluationofanambientdisplayforrealtimeposturefeedbacktosedentaryworkers
AT woojinpark humanfactorsevaluationofanambientdisplayforrealtimeposturefeedbacktosedentaryworkers
_version_ 1724182923531255808