The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city

Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnosis of Angle Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city. Materials and Methods: A sample of 170 Iraqi subjects aged 12–15 years, 85 subjects with Class III malocclusion (42 males and 43 females) were selected on the basis of molar and incisor relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khidair A Salman, Ra'ed J Sa'id
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2006-08-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_163266_d631db914f604bba29fa5adedd191a81.html
id doaj-1335df222f3645519607daddebeb766c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1335df222f3645519607daddebeb766c2020-11-25T02:51:07ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal 1812-12171998-03452006-08-016392s100s10.33899/rden.2005.163266The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul cityKhidair A Salman Ra'ed J Sa'id Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnosis of Angle Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city. Materials and Methods: A sample of 170 Iraqi subjects aged 12–15 years, 85 subjects with Class III malocclusion (42 males and 43 females) were selected on the basis of molar and incisor relationships. Eighty fife subjects with Class I normal occlusion (42 males and 43 females) were chosen. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken for each subject and thirty six measurements were determined (20 angular, 14 linear and 2 ratios). Results: There were 7 subgroups in Class III malocclusion. Pure maxillary retrognathism was the most common subgroup, which represented 31.8%; whereas pure mandibular prognathism was the second subgroup with 23.5%. When the lower anterior facial height (LAFH) was considered with both maxillary and mandibular position, 14 subgroups were found. The most common subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and normal (LAFH) with 16.5% of total sample. The second subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and increased (LAFH) with 15.3%. The third subgroup included subjects with normal maxilla, prognathic mandible and normal (LAFH) which represented 10.6%. Conclusion: the maxillary retrognathism is more common than mandibular prognathism in Mosul Cityhttps://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_163266_d631db914f604bba29fa5adedd191a81.htmldifferential diagnosissubgroupsclass iii malocclusion
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khidair A Salman
Ra'ed J Sa'id
spellingShingle Khidair A Salman
Ra'ed J Sa'id
The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
differential diagnosis
subgroups
class iii malocclusion
author_facet Khidair A Salman
Ra'ed J Sa'id
author_sort Khidair A Salman
title The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
title_short The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
title_full The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
title_fullStr The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
title_full_unstemmed The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city
title_sort differential diagnosis of class iii malocclusion in adolescents of mosul city
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
publishDate 2006-08-01
description Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnosis of Angle Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city. Materials and Methods: A sample of 170 Iraqi subjects aged 12–15 years, 85 subjects with Class III malocclusion (42 males and 43 females) were selected on the basis of molar and incisor relationships. Eighty fife subjects with Class I normal occlusion (42 males and 43 females) were chosen. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken for each subject and thirty six measurements were determined (20 angular, 14 linear and 2 ratios). Results: There were 7 subgroups in Class III malocclusion. Pure maxillary retrognathism was the most common subgroup, which represented 31.8%; whereas pure mandibular prognathism was the second subgroup with 23.5%. When the lower anterior facial height (LAFH) was considered with both maxillary and mandibular position, 14 subgroups were found. The most common subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and normal (LAFH) with 16.5% of total sample. The second subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and increased (LAFH) with 15.3%. The third subgroup included subjects with normal maxilla, prognathic mandible and normal (LAFH) which represented 10.6%. Conclusion: the maxillary retrognathism is more common than mandibular prognathism in Mosul City
topic differential diagnosis
subgroups
class iii malocclusion
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_163266_d631db914f604bba29fa5adedd191a81.html
work_keys_str_mv AT khidairasalman thedifferentialdiagnosisofclassiiimalocclusioninadolescentsofmosulcity
AT raedjsaid thedifferentialdiagnosisofclassiiimalocclusioninadolescentsofmosulcity
AT khidairasalman differentialdiagnosisofclassiiimalocclusioninadolescentsofmosulcity
AT raedjsaid differentialdiagnosisofclassiiimalocclusioninadolescentsofmosulcity
_version_ 1724736138464198656