Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists
Evidence of sex differences in intellectual capabilities remains scant and, rather than revealing genetic origin, it is complicated by the influence of social circumstances. Some inequities persist, and although these have been decreasing in recent decades, therefore, it remains a major task for pol...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X10700528 |
id |
doaj-13330b37df5542698bfd7175fd32edc1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13330b37df5542698bfd7175fd32edc12020-11-25T00:59:32ZengWileyKaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences1607-551X2010-06-01266S10S1610.1016/S1607-551X(10)70052-8Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female ScientistsGisela KaplanEvidence of sex differences in intellectual capabilities remains scant and, rather than revealing genetic origin, it is complicated by the influence of social circumstances. Some inequities persist, and although these have been decreasing in recent decades, therefore, it remains a major task for policy makers and educators to assist in setting up programs, including mentoring opportunities, that are directed at alleviating such inequities. This paper outlines some historical circumstances in science and suggests that mentoring has to be understood in a wide systemic framework. The freedom to think and act and follow research ideas through is intrinsically rewarding to society and to the individual. For female scientists, it is a freedom that has yet to be fully developed and mentoring is just one way in which such a process can be legitimized. The paper outlines how institutions can best do this, and how this might work in practice for the individual, and argues that science needs to have its own code of mentoring.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X10700528discriminationfemale scientistsintelligencementoringsexual politics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gisela Kaplan |
spellingShingle |
Gisela Kaplan Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences discrimination female scientists intelligence mentoring sexual politics |
author_facet |
Gisela Kaplan |
author_sort |
Gisela Kaplan |
title |
Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists |
title_short |
Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists |
title_full |
Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists |
title_fullStr |
Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Making a Life in the Life Sciences and the Role of Mentoring for Female Scientists |
title_sort |
making a life in the life sciences and the role of mentoring for female scientists |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
issn |
1607-551X |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
Evidence of sex differences in intellectual capabilities remains scant and, rather than revealing genetic origin, it is complicated by the influence of social circumstances. Some inequities persist, and although these have been decreasing in recent decades, therefore, it remains a major task for policy makers and educators to assist in setting up programs, including mentoring opportunities, that are directed at alleviating such inequities. This paper outlines some historical circumstances in science and suggests that mentoring has to be understood in a wide systemic framework. The freedom to think and act and follow research ideas through is intrinsically rewarding to society and to the individual. For female scientists, it is a freedom that has yet to be fully developed and mentoring is just one way in which such a process can be legitimized. The paper outlines how institutions can best do this, and how this might work in practice for the individual, and argues that science needs to have its own code of mentoring. |
topic |
discrimination female scientists intelligence mentoring sexual politics |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X10700528 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giselakaplan makingalifeinthelifesciencesandtheroleofmentoringforfemalescientists |
_version_ |
1725217830384697344 |