Can We Map Culture?

Images that convert culture into physical space have a durable appeal, and numbers make it possible to literalize a spatial representation of culture by measuring the “distances” between cultural artifacts. But do cultural relationships really behave like physical distance? There are good reasons to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ted Underwood, Richard Jean So
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Cultural Analytics
Online Access:https://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/24911-can-we-map-culture.pdf
id doaj-132eb150776d49a4a7b91b5f7d0d0ca1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-132eb150776d49a4a7b91b5f7d0d0ca12021-06-17T18:41:17ZengDepartment of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill UniversityJournal of Cultural Analytics2371-45492021-06-01Can We Map Culture?Ted UnderwoodRichard Jean SoImages that convert culture into physical space have a durable appeal, and numbers make it possible to literalize a spatial representation of culture by measuring the “distances” between cultural artifacts. But do cultural relationships really behave like physical distance? There are good reasons to think the analogy is imperfect, and a number of alternative geometries have been proposed—extending, in a few cases, to a systematic distinction between the mathematics of “embodied experience” and “epistemic experience” (Chang and DeDeo 2020). We test several proposed alternatives to spatial metrics against ground truth implicit in human behavior. While it is sometimes possible to improve on distance metrics, we do not yet find evidence that the information-theoretical measures recommended as appropriate for epistemic questions are generally preferable in the cultural domain.https://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/24911-can-we-map-culture.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ted Underwood
Richard Jean So
spellingShingle Ted Underwood
Richard Jean So
Can We Map Culture?
Journal of Cultural Analytics
author_facet Ted Underwood
Richard Jean So
author_sort Ted Underwood
title Can We Map Culture?
title_short Can We Map Culture?
title_full Can We Map Culture?
title_fullStr Can We Map Culture?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Map Culture?
title_sort can we map culture?
publisher Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University
series Journal of Cultural Analytics
issn 2371-4549
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Images that convert culture into physical space have a durable appeal, and numbers make it possible to literalize a spatial representation of culture by measuring the “distances” between cultural artifacts. But do cultural relationships really behave like physical distance? There are good reasons to think the analogy is imperfect, and a number of alternative geometries have been proposed—extending, in a few cases, to a systematic distinction between the mathematics of “embodied experience” and “epistemic experience” (Chang and DeDeo 2020). We test several proposed alternatives to spatial metrics against ground truth implicit in human behavior. While it is sometimes possible to improve on distance metrics, we do not yet find evidence that the information-theoretical measures recommended as appropriate for epistemic questions are generally preferable in the cultural domain.
url https://culturalanalytics.scholasticahq.com/article/24911-can-we-map-culture.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tedunderwood canwemapculture
AT richardjeanso canwemapculture
_version_ 1721373677435486208