Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought
This paper, fundamentally through the analysis and interpretation of Resolutions that have historically been regulating ethical issues that involve scientific research (CNS Resolutions N. 196/96, N. 466/2012, N. 510/2016), seeks to show the inadequacy of such Resolutions for Human and Social Scienc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Práxis Educativa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9764 |
id |
doaj-12f21fba9d4a49379d5e2acc54d8a373 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-12f21fba9d4a49379d5e2acc54d8a3732020-11-24T22:44:33ZporUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Práxis Educativa1809-40311809-43092017-01-0112125726610.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i1.0014Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thoughtFausto dos Santos Amaral Filho0Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná This paper, fundamentally through the analysis and interpretation of Resolutions that have historically been regulating ethical issues that involve scientific research (CNS Resolutions N. 196/96, N. 466/2012, N. 510/2016), seeks to show the inadequacy of such Resolutions for Human and Social Sciences research. In addition, this text wants to point to the political dispute imposed by the area of biomedical sciences that apparently seems to be little concerned with ethical issues per se and seeks, first and foremost, to maintain its power.http://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9764Human and Social SciencesResolutionsResearchEthic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fausto dos Santos Amaral Filho |
spellingShingle |
Fausto dos Santos Amaral Filho Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought Práxis Educativa Human and Social Sciences Resolutions Research Ethic |
author_facet |
Fausto dos Santos Amaral Filho |
author_sort |
Fausto dos Santos Amaral Filho |
title |
Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought |
title_short |
Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought |
title_full |
Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought |
title_fullStr |
Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics and research in Human and Social Sciences: a case to be thought |
title_sort |
ethics and research in human and social sciences: a case to be thought |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
series |
Práxis Educativa |
issn |
1809-4031 1809-4309 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
This paper, fundamentally through the analysis and interpretation of Resolutions that have historically been regulating ethical issues that involve scientific research (CNS Resolutions N. 196/96, N. 466/2012, N. 510/2016), seeks to show the inadequacy of such Resolutions for Human and Social Sciences research. In addition, this text wants to point to the political dispute imposed by the area of biomedical sciences that apparently seems to be little concerned with ethical issues per se and seeks, first and foremost, to maintain its power. |
topic |
Human and Social Sciences Resolutions Research Ethic |
url |
http://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/9764 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT faustodossantosamaralfilho ethicsandresearchinhumanandsocialsciencesacasetobethought |
_version_ |
1725691146330439680 |