Evaluation

Three design methods are usually used in the analysis and design of ground water control systems. These methods are: the analysis using equilibrium formulas, the analysis using flow net and the analysis through numerical modeling. Numerical ground water models have proven to be essential when dealin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M.H. Rabie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-12-01
Series:HBRC Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404814000510
id doaj-12e5da83623e49508c235a3e9a40f5f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12e5da83623e49508c235a3e9a40f5f42020-11-24T21:22:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHBRC Journal1687-40482015-12-0111335336210.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.06.007EvaluationM.H. RabieThree design methods are usually used in the analysis and design of ground water control systems. These methods are: the analysis using equilibrium formulas, the analysis using flow net and the analysis through numerical modeling. Numerical ground water models have proven to be essential when dealing with complex aquifer situations. One of the most known numerical models is “Modflow” which is a three dimensional finite difference model oriented for ground water modeling. The dewatering activities that take place at the Banha power station was utilized in calibrating the performance of the numerical modeling process. A parametric study was carried out with different configurations and boundary conditions. The study covers the performance of sand drains with different depths and spacing. These readings had been compared to “Modflow” results and good agreement between the field data and the analysis results had been observed. For complex ground water control problems where the assumptions of the conventional equilibrium formulas are not valid, the use of these formulas may lead to serious errors in design. In this condition, the use of 3-D finite difference analysis is essential to obtain reliable results and design for a groundwater control system.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404814000510ModflowSand drainCutoff wallComplex aquifer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M.H. Rabie
spellingShingle M.H. Rabie
Evaluation
HBRC Journal
Modflow
Sand drain
Cutoff wall
Complex aquifer
author_facet M.H. Rabie
author_sort M.H. Rabie
title Evaluation
title_short Evaluation
title_full Evaluation
title_fullStr Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation
title_sort evaluation
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series HBRC Journal
issn 1687-4048
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Three design methods are usually used in the analysis and design of ground water control systems. These methods are: the analysis using equilibrium formulas, the analysis using flow net and the analysis through numerical modeling. Numerical ground water models have proven to be essential when dealing with complex aquifer situations. One of the most known numerical models is “Modflow” which is a three dimensional finite difference model oriented for ground water modeling. The dewatering activities that take place at the Banha power station was utilized in calibrating the performance of the numerical modeling process. A parametric study was carried out with different configurations and boundary conditions. The study covers the performance of sand drains with different depths and spacing. These readings had been compared to “Modflow” results and good agreement between the field data and the analysis results had been observed. For complex ground water control problems where the assumptions of the conventional equilibrium formulas are not valid, the use of these formulas may lead to serious errors in design. In this condition, the use of 3-D finite difference analysis is essential to obtain reliable results and design for a groundwater control system.
topic Modflow
Sand drain
Cutoff wall
Complex aquifer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404814000510
work_keys_str_mv AT mhrabie evaluation
_version_ 1725997072691232768