Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether rehabilitation impacts clinically relevant outcomes among adult patients with sepsis. Randomized controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Alli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shunsuke Taito, Mahoko Taito, Masahiro Banno, Hiraku Tsujimoto, Yuki Kataoka, Yasushi Tsujimoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6062068?pdf=render
id doaj-12df401bb58c43eb9eb7369a0b9d2033
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12df401bb58c43eb9eb7369a0b9d20332020-11-25T00:04:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e020129210.1371/journal.pone.0201292Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Shunsuke TaitoMahoko TaitoMasahiro BannoHiraku TsujimotoYuki KataokaYasushi TsujimotoThe objective of this systematic review was to determine whether rehabilitation impacts clinically relevant outcomes among adult patients with sepsis. Randomized controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PEDro, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, as well as conference proceedings and reference lists of relevant articles were collected. Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials on the rehabilitation of patients with sepsis, and the two reviewers independently abstracted trial level data including population characteristics, interventions, comparisons, and clinical outcomes. Our primary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), activity of daily living (ADL), and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were length of stay, return to work, muscle strength, delirium, and all adverse events. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We included two trials enrolling 75 patients. The mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of physical function and physical role in QOL measured by SF-36 were 21.10 (95% CI: 6.57-35.63) and 44.40 (95% CI: 22.55-66.05), respectively. Rehabilitation did not significantly decrease intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (risk ratio, 2.02 [95% CI: 0.46-8.91], I2 = 0%; n = 75). ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay and muscle strength were not statistically significantly different and no adverse events were reported in both studies. The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes was "very low." Data on ADL, return to work, and delirium were not available in any of the trials. Rehabilitation of patients with sepsis might not decrease ICU mortality, but might improve QOL. Further, well-designed trials measuring important outcomes will be needed to determine the benefit and harm of rehabilitation among patients with sepsis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6062068?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shunsuke Taito
Mahoko Taito
Masahiro Banno
Hiraku Tsujimoto
Yuki Kataoka
Yasushi Tsujimoto
spellingShingle Shunsuke Taito
Mahoko Taito
Masahiro Banno
Hiraku Tsujimoto
Yuki Kataoka
Yasushi Tsujimoto
Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shunsuke Taito
Mahoko Taito
Masahiro Banno
Hiraku Tsujimoto
Yuki Kataoka
Yasushi Tsujimoto
author_sort Shunsuke Taito
title Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort rehabilitation for patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether rehabilitation impacts clinically relevant outcomes among adult patients with sepsis. Randomized controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PEDro, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, as well as conference proceedings and reference lists of relevant articles were collected. Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials on the rehabilitation of patients with sepsis, and the two reviewers independently abstracted trial level data including population characteristics, interventions, comparisons, and clinical outcomes. Our primary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), activity of daily living (ADL), and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were length of stay, return to work, muscle strength, delirium, and all adverse events. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We included two trials enrolling 75 patients. The mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of physical function and physical role in QOL measured by SF-36 were 21.10 (95% CI: 6.57-35.63) and 44.40 (95% CI: 22.55-66.05), respectively. Rehabilitation did not significantly decrease intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (risk ratio, 2.02 [95% CI: 0.46-8.91], I2 = 0%; n = 75). ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay and muscle strength were not statistically significantly different and no adverse events were reported in both studies. The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes was "very low." Data on ADL, return to work, and delirium were not available in any of the trials. Rehabilitation of patients with sepsis might not decrease ICU mortality, but might improve QOL. Further, well-designed trials measuring important outcomes will be needed to determine the benefit and harm of rehabilitation among patients with sepsis.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6062068?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shunsuketaito rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahokotaito rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT masahirobanno rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hirakutsujimoto rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yukikataoka rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yasushitsujimoto rehabilitationforpatientswithsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725429723551498240