Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework

In an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world, managers of capital projects are under relentless pressure to consistently meet their performance expectations. At the execution stage, managers have to constantly orchestrate competing demands on scare resources and, simult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iyer K. Chandrashekhar, Banerjee Partha S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-03-01
Series:Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0014
id doaj-12d59a6e99f440acbe0ff26248919759
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12d59a6e99f440acbe0ff262489197592021-09-05T18:15:50ZengSciendoOrganization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal1847-62282019-03-011111892190310.2478/otmcj-2018-0014otmcj-2018-0014Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) FrameworkIyer K. Chandrashekhar0Banerjee Partha S.1Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, DelhiIndiaDEFT Advisory and Research, New Delhi (India)In an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world, managers of capital projects are under relentless pressure to consistently meet their performance expectations. At the execution stage, managers have to constantly orchestrate competing demands on scare resources and, simultaneously, manage project operations to meet time, costs and quality compliances. This calls for simple methods to distinguish factors that could cause execution stage delays and prioritise their remedial actions. The objective, therefore, was to propose and test a methodology through empirical evidence, which could be useful for managers to focus on the distinguishing factors (rather than on all factors) to achieve execution excellence. We used a three-stage methodology leveraging the existing Project Management Institute (PMI) framework to define variables and then tested the methodology using case data generated from projects adopting a grounded theory approach. A set-theoretic, multi-value qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) tool helped appropriately configure this empirical case data and a subsequent Boolean minimisation technique then identified the distinguishing factor(s) that explained superior project schedule performance. The results corroborated literature findings. Two contributions emerged from this study: (a) our methodology enabled a richer analysis of the case than what would have been possible by adopting a more conventional approach; and (b) there is a potential for a domain-specific extension of the PMI framework to cover technology transfer projects having their unique knowledge areas.https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0014qualitative comparative analysisgrounded theorycausal factorsproject performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iyer K. Chandrashekhar
Banerjee Partha S.
spellingShingle Iyer K. Chandrashekhar
Banerjee Partha S.
Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal
qualitative comparative analysis
grounded theory
causal factors
project performance
author_facet Iyer K. Chandrashekhar
Banerjee Partha S.
author_sort Iyer K. Chandrashekhar
title Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
title_short Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
title_full Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
title_fullStr Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
title_full_unstemmed Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework
title_sort identifying new knowledge areas to strengthen the project management institute (pmi) framework
publisher Sciendo
series Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal
issn 1847-6228
publishDate 2019-03-01
description In an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world, managers of capital projects are under relentless pressure to consistently meet their performance expectations. At the execution stage, managers have to constantly orchestrate competing demands on scare resources and, simultaneously, manage project operations to meet time, costs and quality compliances. This calls for simple methods to distinguish factors that could cause execution stage delays and prioritise their remedial actions. The objective, therefore, was to propose and test a methodology through empirical evidence, which could be useful for managers to focus on the distinguishing factors (rather than on all factors) to achieve execution excellence. We used a three-stage methodology leveraging the existing Project Management Institute (PMI) framework to define variables and then tested the methodology using case data generated from projects adopting a grounded theory approach. A set-theoretic, multi-value qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) tool helped appropriately configure this empirical case data and a subsequent Boolean minimisation technique then identified the distinguishing factor(s) that explained superior project schedule performance. The results corroborated literature findings. Two contributions emerged from this study: (a) our methodology enabled a richer analysis of the case than what would have been possible by adopting a more conventional approach; and (b) there is a potential for a domain-specific extension of the PMI framework to cover technology transfer projects having their unique knowledge areas.
topic qualitative comparative analysis
grounded theory
causal factors
project performance
url https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0014
work_keys_str_mv AT iyerkchandrashekhar identifyingnewknowledgeareastostrengthentheprojectmanagementinstitutepmiframework
AT banerjeeparthas identifyingnewknowledgeareastostrengthentheprojectmanagementinstitutepmiframework
_version_ 1717786231250616320