| Summary: | <i>Background and objectives:</i> It is often challenging even for skilled rescuers to provide adequate positive pressure ventilation consistently. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed real-time ventilation feedback device (RTVFD) that estimates tidal volume (TV) and ventilation interval (VI) in real time. <i>Materials and methods:</i> We conducted a randomised, crossover, manikin simulation study. A total of 26 medical providers were randomly assigned to the RTVFD-assisted ventilation (RAV) first group (<i>n</i> = 13) and the non-assisted ventilation (NV) first group (<i>n</i> = 13). Participants provided ventilation using adult and paediatric bag valves (BVs) for 2 min each. After a washout period, the simulation was repeated by exchanging the participants’ groups. <i>Results:</i> The primary outcome was optimal TV in the RAV and NV groups using adult and paediatric BVs. A secondary outcome was optimal VI in the RAV and NV groups using adult and paediatric BVs. The proportions of optimal TV values were higher for the RAVs when using both adult and paediatric BVs (adult BV: 47.29% vs. 18.46%, <i>p</i> < 0.001; paediatric BV: 89.51% vs. 72.66%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than for the NVs. The proportions of optimal VI were significantly higher in RAVs when using both adult and paediatric BVs than that in NVs (adult BV: 95.64% vs. 50.20%, <i>p</i> < 0.001; paediatric BV: 95.83% vs. 57.14%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, we found that with paediatric BVs, the simulation had a higher OR for both optimal TV (13.26; 95% CI, 9.96–17.65; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and VI (1.32; 1.08–1.62, <i>p</i> = 0.007), regardless of RTVFD use. <i>Conclusion:</i> Real-time feedback using RTVFD significantly improves the TV and VI in both adult and paediatric BVs in a manikin simulation study.
|
|---|
