Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
We use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and B...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720 |
id |
doaj-12c49e4adce7411bacf7ec010787a8d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-12c49e4adce7411bacf7ec010787a8d62021-03-03T20:02:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012672010.1371/journal.pone.0126720Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.Rafael Marmolejo-LeyvaMiguel Angel Perez-AngonJane M RussellWe use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and Brazil. Their research output and impact is explored in order to determine their patterns of production, mobility and scientific collaboration as compared with previous studies of the SNI researchers in the periods 1991-2001 and 2003-2009. Our findings confirm that mobility has a strong impact on their international scientific collaboration. We found no substantial influence among the researchers that got their PhD degrees abroad from those trained in Mexican universities. There are significant differences among the areas of knowledge studied: biological sciences, physics and engineering have better production and impact rates than mathematics, geosciences, medicine, agrosciences, chemistry, social sciences and humanities. We found a slight gender difference in research production but Mexican female scientists are underrepresented in our diaspora sample. These findings would have policy implications for the recently established program that will open new academic positions for young Mexican scientists.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva Miguel Angel Perez-Angon Jane M Russell |
spellingShingle |
Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva Miguel Angel Perez-Angon Jane M Russell Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva Miguel Angel Perez-Angon Jane M Russell |
author_sort |
Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva |
title |
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. |
title_short |
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. |
title_full |
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. |
title_fullStr |
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora. |
title_sort |
mobility and international collaboration: case of the mexican scientific diaspora. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
We use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and Brazil. Their research output and impact is explored in order to determine their patterns of production, mobility and scientific collaboration as compared with previous studies of the SNI researchers in the periods 1991-2001 and 2003-2009. Our findings confirm that mobility has a strong impact on their international scientific collaboration. We found no substantial influence among the researchers that got their PhD degrees abroad from those trained in Mexican universities. There are significant differences among the areas of knowledge studied: biological sciences, physics and engineering have better production and impact rates than mathematics, geosciences, medicine, agrosciences, chemistry, social sciences and humanities. We found a slight gender difference in research production but Mexican female scientists are underrepresented in our diaspora sample. These findings would have policy implications for the recently established program that will open new academic positions for young Mexican scientists. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rafaelmarmolejoleyva mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora AT miguelangelperezangon mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora AT janemrussell mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora |
_version_ |
1714824283350368256 |