Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.

We use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva, Miguel Angel Perez-Angon, Jane M Russell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720
id doaj-12c49e4adce7411bacf7ec010787a8d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12c49e4adce7411bacf7ec010787a8d62021-03-03T20:02:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012672010.1371/journal.pone.0126720Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.Rafael Marmolejo-LeyvaMiguel Angel Perez-AngonJane M RussellWe use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and Brazil. Their research output and impact is explored in order to determine their patterns of production, mobility and scientific collaboration as compared with previous studies of the SNI researchers in the periods 1991-2001 and 2003-2009. Our findings confirm that mobility has a strong impact on their international scientific collaboration. We found no substantial influence among the researchers that got their PhD degrees abroad from those trained in Mexican universities. There are significant differences among the areas of knowledge studied: biological sciences, physics and engineering have better production and impact rates than mathematics, geosciences, medicine, agrosciences, chemistry, social sciences and humanities. We found a slight gender difference in research production but Mexican female scientists are underrepresented in our diaspora sample. These findings would have policy implications for the recently established program that will open new academic positions for young Mexican scientists.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva
Miguel Angel Perez-Angon
Jane M Russell
spellingShingle Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva
Miguel Angel Perez-Angon
Jane M Russell
Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva
Miguel Angel Perez-Angon
Jane M Russell
author_sort Rafael Marmolejo-Leyva
title Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
title_short Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
title_full Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
title_fullStr Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
title_full_unstemmed Mobility and International Collaboration: Case of the Mexican Scientific Diaspora.
title_sort mobility and international collaboration: case of the mexican scientific diaspora.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description We use a data set of Mexican researchers working abroad that are included in the Mexican National System of Researchers (SNI). Our diaspora sample includes 479 researchers, most of them holding postdoctoral positions in mainly seven countries: USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Canada and Brazil. Their research output and impact is explored in order to determine their patterns of production, mobility and scientific collaboration as compared with previous studies of the SNI researchers in the periods 1991-2001 and 2003-2009. Our findings confirm that mobility has a strong impact on their international scientific collaboration. We found no substantial influence among the researchers that got their PhD degrees abroad from those trained in Mexican universities. There are significant differences among the areas of knowledge studied: biological sciences, physics and engineering have better production and impact rates than mathematics, geosciences, medicine, agrosciences, chemistry, social sciences and humanities. We found a slight gender difference in research production but Mexican female scientists are underrepresented in our diaspora sample. These findings would have policy implications for the recently established program that will open new academic positions for young Mexican scientists.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126720
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelmarmolejoleyva mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora
AT miguelangelperezangon mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora
AT janemrussell mobilityandinternationalcollaborationcaseofthemexicanscientificdiaspora
_version_ 1714824283350368256