Testing unmanned aircraft systems for salmon spawning surveys

• Main Authors: Phillip A. Groves, Brad Alcorn, Michelle M. Wiest, Jacek M. Maselko, William P. Connor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2016-11-01
• Series: FACETS
• Subjects: small unmanned aircraft; salmon spawning surveys; population estimates
• Online Access: http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0019
• ISSN: 2371-1671; 2371-1671

Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) were tested for counting Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redds as a more accurate, safer alternative to manned helicopter flights. Counting redds from the helicopter was less expensive and time consuming, but of the total redds counted at selected sites with a UAS, an average (± SD) of only 77% ± 14% was counted from the helicopter. A river-wide census of redds was not possible with a UAS because the study area was too large for the single field crew to survey. Simulation analyses were used to compare stratified random sampling (STRS) and sampling proportional to size (PPS) for estimating annual total redd counts from data collected with a UAS. The STRS estimates were more accurate and precise, whereas the PPS estimates, though biased, had 95% CIs that included the observed redd count more frequently. We strongly recommend that researchers conduct simulation analyses to evaluate alternative survey sampling methods if they are considering replacing census counts made from manned aircraft with counts estimated from data collected with a UAS. We conclude that UAS application reduces the risk inherent to manned aircraft flights, but the reduction in risk can come at the cost of estimates of population parameters that can sometimes be inaccurate and lack 95% CI coverage.