A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD)
The purpose of this study is to examine and identify effective variables related to single-subject reading interventions for the struggling readers. This study conducted meta-analysis of 84 single-subject research articles of which 54 were published in Korean and 30 were published in English. Utiliz...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Heliyon |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020318673 |
id |
doaj-12825d16ae6141ba9cb247b942be71d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-12825d16ae6141ba9cb247b942be71d62020-12-09T06:24:42ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402020-11-01611e05024A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD)Dongil Kim0Yeji An1HyeYun Gladys Shin2Jaeho Lee3Soyoung Park4Department of Education, Seoul National University, South KoreaDepartment of Education, Seoul National University, South Korea; Corresponding author.Department of Education, Seoul National University, South KoreaDepartment of Elementary Special Education, Kwangju Women's University, South KoreaDepartment of Special Education, University of Texas at Austin, USAThe purpose of this study is to examine and identify effective variables related to single-subject reading interventions for the struggling readers. This study conducted meta-analysis of 84 single-subject research articles of which 54 were published in Korean and 30 were published in English. Utilizing the Improvement Rate Difference (IRD), a total of 586 effect sizes were produced with the mean effect size of 0.77. Intervention variables were categorized into two types – participant-related and intervention-related variables. Collected studies were analyzed for each effect size calculation. Variables having large effects within grade levels, disability types, implementer and session duration are discerned along with further discussion and educational implications.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020318673Reading interventionStruggling readersSingle subjectMeta-analysisImprovement rate differences (IRD)Education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dongil Kim Yeji An HyeYun Gladys Shin Jaeho Lee Soyoung Park |
spellingShingle |
Dongil Kim Yeji An HyeYun Gladys Shin Jaeho Lee Soyoung Park A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) Heliyon Reading intervention Struggling readers Single subject Meta-analysis Improvement rate differences (IRD) Education |
author_facet |
Dongil Kim Yeji An HyeYun Gladys Shin Jaeho Lee Soyoung Park |
author_sort |
Dongil Kim |
title |
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) |
title_short |
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) |
title_full |
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) |
title_fullStr |
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) |
title_full_unstemmed |
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD) |
title_sort |
meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using improvement rate difference (ird) |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Heliyon |
issn |
2405-8440 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study is to examine and identify effective variables related to single-subject reading interventions for the struggling readers. This study conducted meta-analysis of 84 single-subject research articles of which 54 were published in Korean and 30 were published in English. Utilizing the Improvement Rate Difference (IRD), a total of 586 effect sizes were produced with the mean effect size of 0.77. Intervention variables were categorized into two types – participant-related and intervention-related variables. Collected studies were analyzed for each effect size calculation. Variables having large effects within grade levels, disability types, implementer and session duration are discerned along with further discussion and educational implications. |
topic |
Reading intervention Struggling readers Single subject Meta-analysis Improvement rate differences (IRD) Education |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020318673 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dongilkim ametaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT yejian ametaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT hyeyungladysshin ametaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT jaeholee ametaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT soyoungpark ametaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT dongilkim metaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT yejian metaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT hyeyungladysshin metaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT jaeholee metaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird AT soyoungpark metaanalysisofsinglesubjectreadinginterventionstudiesforstrugglingreadersusingimprovementratedifferenceird |
_version_ |
1724388376199561216 |