Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up
Dieter Dausch,1,2 Burglinde Dausch,2 Matthias Wottke,3 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde31Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea; 2Augen-Laser-Klinik Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: One hundred eyes from 55 adult patients with myopia were retros...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2014-11-01
|
Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clinical-outcomes-in-prk-with-a-standard-and-aspherical--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
id |
doaj-12800087930c4dea8126697d3316ba83 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-12800087930c4dea8126697d3316ba832020-11-24T22:50:43ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832014-11-012014default2251226019277Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-upDausch DDausch BWottke MSluyterman van Langeweyde G Dieter Dausch,1,2 Burglinde Dausch,2 Matthias Wottke,3 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde31Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea; 2Augen-Laser-Klinik Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: One hundred eyes from 55 adult patients with myopia were retrospectively studied to determine the comparative safety, efficacy, and predictability of aberration smart ablation (ASA) and a new advanced ablation algorithm (Triple-A) using the MEL® 80 excimer laser.Methods: Fifty myopic eyes with a manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between -1.0 diopters (D) and -9.75 D were consecutively treated with photorefractive keratectomy ASA, and 50 myopic eyes with an MRSE between -1.38 D and -11.0 D with photorefractive keratectomy Triple-A. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, MRSE, the absolute value of the cylinder, corrected distance visual acuity, and postoperative complications at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (1 year) were descriptively analyzed and compared at 1 year.Results: After 12 months, the MRSE variance was statistically significantly better in patients triaged to receive Triple-A compared with patients receiving ASA (ASA, ±0.7 D; Triple-A, ±0.15 D; P<0.001). Furthermore, no patient in the Triple-A group had any cylinder postoperatively. Patients in the Triple-A treatment arm achieved a superior result. No statistically significant difference in the two treatment arms was noted for the analysis of the mean MRSE at 12 months (P=0.78).Conclusion: Triple-A was more effective than standard aspherical surgical intervention in a number of treatment outcome parameters (eg, MRSE, astigmatism, efficacy index). The two surgical procedures were equivalent in terms of safety. Keywords: aberration smart ablation (ASA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, Triple-A advanced ablation algorithm, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, excimer laser, PRK, ablation profilehttp://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clinical-outcomes-in-prk-with-a-standard-and-aspherical--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dausch D Dausch B Wottke M Sluyterman van Langeweyde G |
spellingShingle |
Dausch D Dausch B Wottke M Sluyterman van Langeweyde G Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up Clinical Ophthalmology |
author_facet |
Dausch D Dausch B Wottke M Sluyterman van Langeweyde G |
author_sort |
Dausch D |
title |
Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
title_short |
Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
title_full |
Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
title_sort |
comparison of clinical outcomes in prk with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Clinical Ophthalmology |
issn |
1177-5483 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
Dieter Dausch,1,2 Burglinde Dausch,2 Matthias Wottke,3 Georg Sluyterman van Langeweyde31Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea; 2Augen-Laser-Klinik Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany Purpose: One hundred eyes from 55 adult patients with myopia were retrospectively studied to determine the comparative safety, efficacy, and predictability of aberration smart ablation (ASA) and a new advanced ablation algorithm (Triple-A) using the MEL® 80 excimer laser.Methods: Fifty myopic eyes with a manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between -1.0 diopters (D) and -9.75 D were consecutively treated with photorefractive keratectomy ASA, and 50 myopic eyes with an MRSE between -1.38 D and -11.0 D with photorefractive keratectomy Triple-A. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, MRSE, the absolute value of the cylinder, corrected distance visual acuity, and postoperative complications at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (1 year) were descriptively analyzed and compared at 1 year.Results: After 12 months, the MRSE variance was statistically significantly better in patients triaged to receive Triple-A compared with patients receiving ASA (ASA, ±0.7 D; Triple-A, ±0.15 D; P<0.001). Furthermore, no patient in the Triple-A group had any cylinder postoperatively. Patients in the Triple-A treatment arm achieved a superior result. No statistically significant difference in the two treatment arms was noted for the analysis of the mean MRSE at 12 months (P=0.78).Conclusion: Triple-A was more effective than standard aspherical surgical intervention in a number of treatment outcome parameters (eg, MRSE, astigmatism, efficacy index). The two surgical procedures were equivalent in terms of safety. Keywords: aberration smart ablation (ASA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, Triple-A advanced ablation algorithm, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, excimer laser, PRK, ablation profile |
url |
http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clinical-outcomes-in-prk-with-a-standard-and-aspherical--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dauschd comparisonofclinicaloutcomesinprkwithastandardandasphericaloptimizedprofileafullcaseanalysisof100eyeswith1yearfollowup AT dauschb comparisonofclinicaloutcomesinprkwithastandardandasphericaloptimizedprofileafullcaseanalysisof100eyeswith1yearfollowup AT wottkem comparisonofclinicaloutcomesinprkwithastandardandasphericaloptimizedprofileafullcaseanalysisof100eyeswith1yearfollowup AT sluytermanvanlangeweydeg comparisonofclinicaloutcomesinprkwithastandardandasphericaloptimizedprofileafullcaseanalysisof100eyeswith1yearfollowup |
_version_ |
1725671656115929088 |