Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review

<p>The vital role of terrestrial biogeochemical cycles in influencing global climate change is explored by modelling groups internationally through land surface models (LSMs) coupled to atmospheric and oceanic components within Earth system models (ESMs). The sixth phase of the Coupled Model I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Spafford, A. H. MacDougall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-09-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5863/2021/gmd-14-5863-2021.pdf
id doaj-127b3feb12ae4cedb73b6204d8587ef5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-127b3feb12ae4cedb73b6204d8587ef52021-09-27T11:49:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032021-09-01145863588910.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a reviewL. Spafford0L. Spafford1A. H. MacDougall2Climate and Environment, Saint Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, CanadaEnvironmental Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, CanadaClimate and Environment, Saint Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada<p>The vital role of terrestrial biogeochemical cycles in influencing global climate change is explored by modelling groups internationally through land surface models (LSMs) coupled to atmospheric and oceanic components within Earth system models (ESMs). The sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) provided an opportunity to compare ESM output by providing common forcings and experimental protocols. Despite these common experimental protocols, a variety of terrestrial biogeochemical cycle validation approaches were adopted by CMIP6 participants, leading to ambiguous model performance assessment and uncertainty attribution across ESMs. In this review we summarize current methods of terrestrial biogeochemical cycle validation utilized by CMIP6 participants and concurrent community model comparison studies. We focus on variables including the dimensions of evaluations, observation-based reference datasets, and metrics of model performance. To ensure objective and thorough validations for the seventh phase of CMIP (CMIP7), we recommend the use of a standard validation protocol employing a broad suite of certainty-weighted observation-based reference datasets, targeted model performance metrics, and comparisons across a range of spatiotemporal scales.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5863/2021/gmd-14-5863-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Spafford
L. Spafford
A. H. MacDougall
spellingShingle L. Spafford
L. Spafford
A. H. MacDougall
Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet L. Spafford
L. Spafford
A. H. MacDougall
author_sort L. Spafford
title Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
title_short Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
title_full Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
title_fullStr Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
title_full_unstemmed Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
title_sort validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in cmip6 earth system models: a review
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2021-09-01
description <p>The vital role of terrestrial biogeochemical cycles in influencing global climate change is explored by modelling groups internationally through land surface models (LSMs) coupled to atmospheric and oceanic components within Earth system models (ESMs). The sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) provided an opportunity to compare ESM output by providing common forcings and experimental protocols. Despite these common experimental protocols, a variety of terrestrial biogeochemical cycle validation approaches were adopted by CMIP6 participants, leading to ambiguous model performance assessment and uncertainty attribution across ESMs. In this review we summarize current methods of terrestrial biogeochemical cycle validation utilized by CMIP6 participants and concurrent community model comparison studies. We focus on variables including the dimensions of evaluations, observation-based reference datasets, and metrics of model performance. To ensure objective and thorough validations for the seventh phase of CMIP (CMIP7), we recommend the use of a standard validation protocol employing a broad suite of certainty-weighted observation-based reference datasets, targeted model performance metrics, and comparisons across a range of spatiotemporal scales.</p>
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5863/2021/gmd-14-5863-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lspafford validationofterrestrialbiogeochemistryincmip6earthsystemmodelsareview
AT lspafford validationofterrestrialbiogeochemistryincmip6earthsystemmodelsareview
AT ahmacdougall validationofterrestrialbiogeochemistryincmip6earthsystemmodelsareview
_version_ 1716866836421672960