Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
This article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water Alternatives Association
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Water Alternatives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/file |
id |
doaj-126e903775a34756b34105cc0578c91c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-126e903775a34756b34105cc0578c91c2020-11-25T00:42:37ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752017-02-011016580Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water AgendaSofie Hellberg0University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenThis article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'is' and 'does' and shows that water and water governance are productive of lifestyles, people’s self-understanding and how they view their place in the social hierarchy. The analysis brings to light that a differentiated management system, that provides different levels of water services to different populations and individuals, becomes part of (re)producing social hierarchies and deepens divisions between communities. Based on these findings, the article argues that while the basic water agenda has brought successful results globally and remains important in terms of guaranteeing health and survival for the most vulnerable, it should not be confused with efforts of social sustainability. Social sustainability would not only involve a situation where basic needs are met but would also have to address effects of water systems on the relationships between individuals and populations in society.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/fileSocial sustainabilitywaterbasic needsbiopoliticsSouth Africa |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sofie Hellberg |
spellingShingle |
Sofie Hellberg Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda Water Alternatives Social sustainability water basic needs biopolitics South Africa |
author_facet |
Sofie Hellberg |
author_sort |
Sofie Hellberg |
title |
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda |
title_short |
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda |
title_full |
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda |
title_fullStr |
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda |
title_full_unstemmed |
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda |
title_sort |
water for survival, water for pleasure – a biopolitical perspective on the social sustainability of the basic water agenda |
publisher |
Water Alternatives Association |
series |
Water Alternatives |
issn |
1965-0175 1965-0175 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
This article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'is' and 'does' and shows that water and water governance are productive of lifestyles, people’s self-understanding and how they view their place in the social hierarchy. The analysis brings to light that a differentiated management system, that provides different levels of water services to different populations and individuals, becomes part of (re)producing social hierarchies and deepens divisions between communities. Based on these findings, the article argues that while the basic water agenda has brought successful results globally and remains important in terms of guaranteeing health and survival for the most vulnerable, it should not be confused with efforts of social sustainability. Social sustainability would not only involve a situation where basic needs are met but would also have to address effects of water systems on the relationships between individuals and populations in society. |
topic |
Social sustainability water basic needs biopolitics South Africa |
url |
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/file |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sofiehellberg waterforsurvivalwaterforpleasureabiopoliticalperspectiveonthesocialsustainabilityofthebasicwateragenda |
_version_ |
1725281354974756864 |