Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda

This article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sofie Hellberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2017-02-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/file
id doaj-126e903775a34756b34105cc0578c91c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-126e903775a34756b34105cc0578c91c2020-11-25T00:42:37ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752017-02-011016580Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water AgendaSofie Hellberg0University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenThis article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'is' and 'does' and shows that water and water governance are productive of lifestyles, people’s self-understanding and how they view their place in the social hierarchy. The analysis brings to light that a differentiated management system, that provides different levels of water services to different populations and individuals, becomes part of (re)producing social hierarchies and deepens divisions between communities. Based on these findings, the article argues that while the basic water agenda has brought successful results globally and remains important in terms of guaranteeing health and survival for the most vulnerable, it should not be confused with efforts of social sustainability. Social sustainability would not only involve a situation where basic needs are met but would also have to address effects of water systems on the relationships between individuals and populations in society.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/fileSocial sustainabilitywaterbasic needsbiopoliticsSouth Africa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sofie Hellberg
spellingShingle Sofie Hellberg
Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
Water Alternatives
Social sustainability
water
basic needs
biopolitics
South Africa
author_facet Sofie Hellberg
author_sort Sofie Hellberg
title Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
title_short Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
title_full Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
title_fullStr Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
title_full_unstemmed Water for Survival, Water for Pleasure – A Biopolitical Perspective on the Social Sustainability of the Basic Water Agenda
title_sort water for survival, water for pleasure – a biopolitical perspective on the social sustainability of the basic water agenda
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2017-02-01
description This article explores the social sustainability of the basic water agenda. It does so through a biopolitical analysis of water narratives from eThekwini municipality, South Africa, where a policy of Free Basic Water (FBW) has been implemented. The article addresses the question of what water 'is' and 'does' and shows that water and water governance are productive of lifestyles, people’s self-understanding and how they view their place in the social hierarchy. The analysis brings to light that a differentiated management system, that provides different levels of water services to different populations and individuals, becomes part of (re)producing social hierarchies and deepens divisions between communities. Based on these findings, the article argues that while the basic water agenda has brought successful results globally and remains important in terms of guaranteeing health and survival for the most vulnerable, it should not be confused with efforts of social sustainability. Social sustainability would not only involve a situation where basic needs are met but would also have to address effects of water systems on the relationships between individuals and populations in society.
topic Social sustainability
water
basic needs
biopolitics
South Africa
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/342-a10-1-4/file
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiehellberg waterforsurvivalwaterforpleasureabiopoliticalperspectiveonthesocialsustainabilityofthebasicwateragenda
_version_ 1725281354974756864