Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of multiple-file system EndoStar E5 and single-file system XP EndoShaper (XPS) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and method: A total of 50 mesiobuccal canals of the maxill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikita Arun Kamat, Saritha Vallabhaneni, Prahlad Saraf, Laxmikant Kamatagi, Shrishail Totad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Endodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2021;volume=33;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kamat
id doaj-125a18f2fb75439ba7fafabdfb325700
record_format Article
spelling doaj-125a18f2fb75439ba7fafabdfb3257002021-03-31T06:03:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEndodontology0970-72122021-01-01331303510.4103/endo.endo_16_20Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5Nikita Arun KamatSaritha VallabhaneniPrahlad SarafLaxmikant KamatagiShrishail TotadIntroduction: The aim of this study was to compare canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of multiple-file system EndoStar E5 and single-file system XP EndoShaper (XPS) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and method: A total of 50 mesiobuccal canals of the maxillary first molars with curvatures of 15°°–30°° were chosen and randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 25). Canals were shaped with XPS in Group 1 and with EndoStar E5 in Group 2. According to the manufacturer's instructions, canal preparation was made. Canals were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT scanner to evaluate the root canal transportation at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex. Data were statistically analyzed, and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: Intergroup comparison mesiodistally showed that there was no significant canal transporation among both groups. Intergroup comparison buccolingually showed that there was statistically significant canal transporation at five millimeters when instrumented with XPS than EndoStar E5. With respect to RDT, intergroup comparison showed that mesially, distally, lingually, and bucally, there was no significant difference in the RDT. Conclusion: The present study indicates safety in the preparation of root canals with XPS as well as EndoStar E5. Both the files maintained original canal curvature while preserving RDT.http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2021;volume=33;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kamatcanal transportationcone-beam computed tomographyendostar e5remaining dentin thicknessxp endoshaper
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikita Arun Kamat
Saritha Vallabhaneni
Prahlad Saraf
Laxmikant Kamatagi
Shrishail Totad
spellingShingle Nikita Arun Kamat
Saritha Vallabhaneni
Prahlad Saraf
Laxmikant Kamatagi
Shrishail Totad
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
Endodontology
canal transportation
cone-beam computed tomography
endostar e5
remaining dentin thickness
xp endoshaper
author_facet Nikita Arun Kamat
Saritha Vallabhaneni
Prahlad Saraf
Laxmikant Kamatagi
Shrishail Totad
author_sort Nikita Arun Kamat
title Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
title_short Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
title_full Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
title_fullStr Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
title_full_unstemmed Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using XP EndoShaper and EndoStar E5
title_sort cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation and evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using xp endoshaper and endostar e5
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Endodontology
issn 0970-7212
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of multiple-file system EndoStar E5 and single-file system XP EndoShaper (XPS) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and method: A total of 50 mesiobuccal canals of the maxillary first molars with curvatures of 15°°–30°° were chosen and randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 25). Canals were shaped with XPS in Group 1 and with EndoStar E5 in Group 2. According to the manufacturer's instructions, canal preparation was made. Canals were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT scanner to evaluate the root canal transportation at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex. Data were statistically analyzed, and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: Intergroup comparison mesiodistally showed that there was no significant canal transporation among both groups. Intergroup comparison buccolingually showed that there was statistically significant canal transporation at five millimeters when instrumented with XPS than EndoStar E5. With respect to RDT, intergroup comparison showed that mesially, distally, lingually, and bucally, there was no significant difference in the RDT. Conclusion: The present study indicates safety in the preparation of root canals with XPS as well as EndoStar E5. Both the files maintained original canal curvature while preserving RDT.
topic canal transportation
cone-beam computed tomography
endostar e5
remaining dentin thickness
xp endoshaper
url http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2021;volume=33;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kamat
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitaarunkamat conebeamcomputedtomographyassessmentofrootcanaltransportationandevaluationofremainingdentinthicknessusingxpendoshaperandendostare5
AT sarithavallabhaneni conebeamcomputedtomographyassessmentofrootcanaltransportationandevaluationofremainingdentinthicknessusingxpendoshaperandendostare5
AT prahladsaraf conebeamcomputedtomographyassessmentofrootcanaltransportationandevaluationofremainingdentinthicknessusingxpendoshaperandendostare5
AT laxmikantkamatagi conebeamcomputedtomographyassessmentofrootcanaltransportationandevaluationofremainingdentinthicknessusingxpendoshaperandendostare5
AT shrishailtotad conebeamcomputedtomographyassessmentofrootcanaltransportationandevaluationofremainingdentinthicknessusingxpendoshaperandendostare5
_version_ 1724178344332754944