The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange

Water scarcity is an important social and ecological issue that is becoming increasingly problematic with the onset of climate change. This study explores the extent to which water resources in developing countries are affected by the vertical flow of exports to high-income countries. In examining t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jared B. Fitzgerald, Daniel Auerbach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1263
id doaj-124f5fa4a46446da97fb34db5e7ee72a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-124f5fa4a46446da97fb34db5e7ee72a2020-11-24T23:49:24ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502016-12-01812126310.3390/su8121263su8121263The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal ExchangeJared B. Fitzgerald0Daniel Auerbach1Department of Sociology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USADepartment of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USAWater scarcity is an important social and ecological issue that is becoming increasingly problematic with the onset of climate change. This study explores the extent to which water resources in developing countries are affected by the vertical flow of exports to high-income countries. In examining this question, the authors engage the sociological theory of ecologically unequal exchange, which argues that high-income countries are able to partially externalize the environmental costs of their consumption to lower-income countries. The authors use a relatively new and underutilized measure of water usage, the water footprint, which quantifies the amount of water used in the entire production process. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and robust regression techniques are employed in the cross-national analysis of 138 countries. The results provide partial support of the propositions of ecologically unequal exchange theory. In particular, the results highlight the importance of structural position in the global economy for understanding the effects of trade on water resources.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1263environmentecologically unequal exchangedevelopmentwaterwater footprintglobalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jared B. Fitzgerald
Daniel Auerbach
spellingShingle Jared B. Fitzgerald
Daniel Auerbach
The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
Sustainability
environment
ecologically unequal exchange
development
water
water footprint
globalization
author_facet Jared B. Fitzgerald
Daniel Auerbach
author_sort Jared B. Fitzgerald
title The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
title_short The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
title_full The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
title_fullStr The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
title_full_unstemmed The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange
title_sort political economy of the water footprint: a cross-national analysis of ecologically unequal exchange
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Water scarcity is an important social and ecological issue that is becoming increasingly problematic with the onset of climate change. This study explores the extent to which water resources in developing countries are affected by the vertical flow of exports to high-income countries. In examining this question, the authors engage the sociological theory of ecologically unequal exchange, which argues that high-income countries are able to partially externalize the environmental costs of their consumption to lower-income countries. The authors use a relatively new and underutilized measure of water usage, the water footprint, which quantifies the amount of water used in the entire production process. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and robust regression techniques are employed in the cross-national analysis of 138 countries. The results provide partial support of the propositions of ecologically unequal exchange theory. In particular, the results highlight the importance of structural position in the global economy for understanding the effects of trade on water resources.
topic environment
ecologically unequal exchange
development
water
water footprint
globalization
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1263
work_keys_str_mv AT jaredbfitzgerald thepoliticaleconomyofthewaterfootprintacrossnationalanalysisofecologicallyunequalexchange
AT danielauerbach thepoliticaleconomyofthewaterfootprintacrossnationalanalysisofecologicallyunequalexchange
AT jaredbfitzgerald politicaleconomyofthewaterfootprintacrossnationalanalysisofecologicallyunequalexchange
AT danielauerbach politicaleconomyofthewaterfootprintacrossnationalanalysisofecologicallyunequalexchange
_version_ 1725482335579668480