Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study

Objective: During delivery counseling, some women with previous uncomplicated cesarean section (CS) wish mechanical induction of labor (IOL) but they are not accepting the added risk of using ecbolics to induce and/or augment labor. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hytham Atia, Mohamed Ellaithy, Ahmed Altraigey, Mohamed Kolkailah, Amal Alserehi, Shabana Ashfaq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-06-01
Series:Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455918300834
id doaj-123d4b03e62640dcb218a5644d4a648f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-123d4b03e62640dcb218a5644d4a648f2020-11-24T21:56:50ZengElsevierTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology1028-45592018-06-0157342142610.1016/j.tjog.2018.04.017Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort studyHytham Atia0Mohamed Ellaithy1Ahmed Altraigey2Mohamed Kolkailah3Amal Alserehi4Shabana Ashfaq5Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi ArabiaObjective: During delivery counseling, some women with previous uncomplicated cesarean section (CS) wish mechanical induction of labor (IOL) but they are not accepting the added risk of using ecbolics to induce and/or augment labor. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the isolated use of transcervical Foley's catheter balloon as a mean of mechanical cervical ripening (CR)/IOL and successful ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Materials and methods: A cohort study was conducted in two tertiary care maternity hospitals between October 2013 and July 2016 and recruited women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation who had previous one uncomplicated CS and were scheduled for mechanical CR/IOL at term for routine obstetric indications. No ecbolics were used for induction or augmentation of labor as per patients' request. The primary outcome variable was the rate of successful VBAC. Results: 108 Women had a completed trial of mechanical CR/IOL without ecbolics till delivery. Active labor started in 94 women (87%), however only 43 women (39.8%) had successful VBAC. No woman in the study cohort had uterine rupture, scar dehiscence, uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage and/or puerperal sepsis. No cases were admitted to intensive care units and there were no maternal mortalities. Prior successful VBAC and post-expulsion BS were the only independent predictors for successful VBAC and shorter duration of labor after balloon expulsion. Conclusion: Mechanical IOL with the mere use of transcervical Foley's catheter is a safe and effective method of VBAC in women refusing use of ecbolics.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455918300834Mechanical induction of laborPrior cesarean sectionScarred uterusTrial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC)Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hytham Atia
Mohamed Ellaithy
Ahmed Altraigey
Mohamed Kolkailah
Amal Alserehi
Shabana Ashfaq
spellingShingle Hytham Atia
Mohamed Ellaithy
Ahmed Altraigey
Mohamed Kolkailah
Amal Alserehi
Shabana Ashfaq
Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Mechanical induction of labor
Prior cesarean section
Scarred uterus
Trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC)
Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC)
author_facet Hytham Atia
Mohamed Ellaithy
Ahmed Altraigey
Mohamed Kolkailah
Amal Alserehi
Shabana Ashfaq
author_sort Hytham Atia
title Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
title_short Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
title_full Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
title_fullStr Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
title_sort mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study
publisher Elsevier
series Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
issn 1028-4559
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Objective: During delivery counseling, some women with previous uncomplicated cesarean section (CS) wish mechanical induction of labor (IOL) but they are not accepting the added risk of using ecbolics to induce and/or augment labor. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the isolated use of transcervical Foley's catheter balloon as a mean of mechanical cervical ripening (CR)/IOL and successful ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Materials and methods: A cohort study was conducted in two tertiary care maternity hospitals between October 2013 and July 2016 and recruited women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation who had previous one uncomplicated CS and were scheduled for mechanical CR/IOL at term for routine obstetric indications. No ecbolics were used for induction or augmentation of labor as per patients' request. The primary outcome variable was the rate of successful VBAC. Results: 108 Women had a completed trial of mechanical CR/IOL without ecbolics till delivery. Active labor started in 94 women (87%), however only 43 women (39.8%) had successful VBAC. No woman in the study cohort had uterine rupture, scar dehiscence, uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage and/or puerperal sepsis. No cases were admitted to intensive care units and there were no maternal mortalities. Prior successful VBAC and post-expulsion BS were the only independent predictors for successful VBAC and shorter duration of labor after balloon expulsion. Conclusion: Mechanical IOL with the mere use of transcervical Foley's catheter is a safe and effective method of VBAC in women refusing use of ecbolics.
topic Mechanical induction of labor
Prior cesarean section
Scarred uterus
Trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC)
Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455918300834
work_keys_str_mv AT hythamatia mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
AT mohamedellaithy mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
AT ahmedaltraigey mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
AT mohamedkolkailah mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
AT amalalserehi mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
AT shabanaashfaq mechanicalinductionoflaborandecboliclessvaginalbirthaftercesareansectionacohortstudy
_version_ 1725856868603002880