Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor
The “transformation problem” in Marx’s Capital (how to make compatible the labour theory of value from the first book with “prices of production” from the third book) has been one of the main reasons to refute the marxist theory and, at the same time, a privileged matter in order to analyze the meth...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2011-11-01
|
Series: | Logos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/36856 |
id |
doaj-123ae5440c904fbda5b562d239cd0d72 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-123ae5440c904fbda5b562d239cd0d722020-11-25T01:03:14ZdeuUniversidad Complutense de MadridLogos1575-68661988-32422011-11-01440517610.5209/rev_ASEM.2011.v44.3685636772Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valorLuis Alegre Zahonero0Daniel Iraberri Pérez1Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Complutense de MadridThe “transformation problem” in Marx’s Capital (how to make compatible the labour theory of value from the first book with “prices of production” from the third book) has been one of the main reasons to refute the marxist theory and, at the same time, a privileged matter in order to analyze the method question. In this paper, we try to analyze the sense and foundation of the labobour theory of value discussing with any attempt of reading Marx Capital as the development of a supposed “dialectic method”. Analyzing the manuscripts and drafts that Marx did not finish, we try to defend that, contrary to what Engels thought (because it had been anounced by Marx himself), it is not possible to find in the third book a trace of the so expected “dialectic solution” to the “transformation problem”. That demands, of course, a different interpretation to explain the sense of the “transformation” of value into “production prices”.http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/36856Marxvalorprecio de producciónmétododialéctica. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luis Alegre Zahonero Daniel Iraberri Pérez |
spellingShingle |
Luis Alegre Zahonero Daniel Iraberri Pérez Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor Logos Marx valor precio de producción método dialéctica. |
author_facet |
Luis Alegre Zahonero Daniel Iraberri Pérez |
author_sort |
Luis Alegre Zahonero |
title |
Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
title_short |
Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
title_full |
Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
title_fullStr |
Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
title_sort |
sentido y fundamento de la teoría laboral del valor |
publisher |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
series |
Logos |
issn |
1575-6866 1988-3242 |
publishDate |
2011-11-01 |
description |
The “transformation problem” in Marx’s Capital (how to make compatible the labour theory of value from the first book with “prices of production” from the third book) has been one of the main reasons to refute the marxist theory and, at the same time, a privileged matter in order to analyze the method question. In this paper, we try to analyze the sense and foundation of the labobour theory of value discussing with any attempt of reading Marx Capital as the development of a supposed “dialectic method”. Analyzing the manuscripts and drafts that Marx did not finish, we try to defend that, contrary to what Engels thought (because it had been anounced by Marx himself), it is not possible to find in the third book a trace of the so expected “dialectic solution” to the “transformation problem”. That demands, of course, a different interpretation to explain the sense of the “transformation” of value into “production prices”. |
topic |
Marx valor precio de producción método dialéctica. |
url |
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/36856 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luisalegrezahonero sentidoyfundamentodelateorialaboraldelvalor AT danieliraberriperez sentidoyfundamentodelateorialaboraldelvalor |
_version_ |
1725201558376808448 |