A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient

In this article we compare two different techniques to measure the concentration of saline solutions for the identification of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient in soils saturated with distilled water. They are the radiation measurement technique and the electrical conductivity measurement tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L.M. Pereira, R. De Souza, H.R.B. Orlande, R.M. Cotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering 2001-09-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322001000300005
id doaj-122eaf0c7e0a4b2b8c30755e643ff98c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-122eaf0c7e0a4b2b8c30755e643ff98c2020-11-24T20:59:14ZengBrazilian Society of Chemical EngineeringBrazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering0104-66321678-43832001-09-0118325326510.1590/S0104-66322001000300005A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficientL.M. PereiraR. De SouzaH.R.B. OrlandeR.M. CottaIn this article we compare two different techniques to measure the concentration of saline solutions for the identification of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient in soils saturated with distilled water. They are the radiation measurement technique and the electrical conductivity measurement technique. These techniques are compared in terms of measured quantities, sensitivity coefficients with respect to unknown parameters and the determinant of the information matrix. The apparent mass diffusion coefficient is estimated by utilizing simulated measurements containing random errors. The Levenberg-Marquardt method of minimization of the least-squares norm is used as the parameter estimation procedure. The effects of the volume of saline solution injected into the column devised for the experiments on the accuracy of the estimated parameters are also addressed in this article.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322001000300005radiation measurement techniqueelectrical conductivity measurement technique
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L.M. Pereira
R. De Souza
H.R.B. Orlande
R.M. Cotta
spellingShingle L.M. Pereira
R. De Souza
H.R.B. Orlande
R.M. Cotta
A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
radiation measurement technique
electrical conductivity measurement technique
author_facet L.M. Pereira
R. De Souza
H.R.B. Orlande
R.M. Cotta
author_sort L.M. Pereira
title A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
title_short A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
title_full A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
title_fullStr A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
title_sort comparison of concentration measurement techniques for the estimation of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient
publisher Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
series Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
issn 0104-6632
1678-4383
publishDate 2001-09-01
description In this article we compare two different techniques to measure the concentration of saline solutions for the identification of the apparent mass diffusion coefficient in soils saturated with distilled water. They are the radiation measurement technique and the electrical conductivity measurement technique. These techniques are compared in terms of measured quantities, sensitivity coefficients with respect to unknown parameters and the determinant of the information matrix. The apparent mass diffusion coefficient is estimated by utilizing simulated measurements containing random errors. The Levenberg-Marquardt method of minimization of the least-squares norm is used as the parameter estimation procedure. The effects of the volume of saline solution injected into the column devised for the experiments on the accuracy of the estimated parameters are also addressed in this article.
topic radiation measurement technique
electrical conductivity measurement technique
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322001000300005
work_keys_str_mv AT lmpereira acomparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT rdesouza acomparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT hrborlande acomparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT rmcotta acomparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT lmpereira comparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT rdesouza comparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT hrborlande comparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
AT rmcotta comparisonofconcentrationmeasurementtechniquesfortheestimationoftheapparentmassdiffusioncoefficient
_version_ 1716783230412128256