Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines

In this paper, we introduce the phrase “cultural robotics” to refer to the interdisciplinary analysis of autonomous machines and their mutual construction with society: as culture constructs robots, they are (re)constructing us. The objects we study range from industrial manufacturing devices to soc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Audrey Bennett, Ron Eglash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Complutense de Madrid 2013-08-01
Series:Revista Teknokultura
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/48254
id doaj-122a66e1331b4f9ca349fae1a1da13c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-122a66e1331b4f9ca349fae1a1da13c72020-11-24T22:56:13ZengUniversidad Complutense de MadridRevista Teknokultura1549-22302013-08-0110232735010.5209/rev_TK.2013.v10.n2.4825446185Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machinesAudrey Bennett0Ron Eglash1The Union Institute CARensselaer Polytechnic InstituteIn this paper, we introduce the phrase “cultural robotics” to refer to the interdisciplinary analysis of autonomous machines and their mutual construction with society: as culture constructs robots, they are (re)constructing us. The objects we study range from industrial manufacturing devices to socially-intelligent robots (SIRs), and our disciplinary frameworks include humanities-oriented approaches –cultural anthropology and graphic design in particular—as well as cybernetics and computational sciences. We will examine the cultural significance of two SIRs portrayed in pop culture, analyze the socio-technical history of autonomous devices such as the master-slave circuit, and explore the ways in which such observations might contribute to efforts such as participatory design (discussed here in terms of Bennett’s “interactive aesthetics”). We conclude with a recent case study in which racial identity and robot design had direct intersections. Like Haraway and Latour, we aim to prevent either technocentric or human-centric perspectives from dominating the analysis. It is our hope that more democratic and sustainable ways of designing and using robots can emerge from this view of hybridity and co-evolution between social and technical worlds.http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/48254Estética interactiva, historia de dispositivos autónomos, robots socialmente interactivos.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Audrey Bennett
Ron Eglash
spellingShingle Audrey Bennett
Ron Eglash
Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
Revista Teknokultura
Estética interactiva, historia de dispositivos autónomos, robots socialmente interactivos.
author_facet Audrey Bennett
Ron Eglash
author_sort Audrey Bennett
title Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
title_short Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
title_full Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
title_fullStr Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
title_full_unstemmed Cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
title_sort cultural robotics: on the intersections of identity and autonomy in people and machines
publisher Universidad Complutense de Madrid
series Revista Teknokultura
issn 1549-2230
publishDate 2013-08-01
description In this paper, we introduce the phrase “cultural robotics” to refer to the interdisciplinary analysis of autonomous machines and their mutual construction with society: as culture constructs robots, they are (re)constructing us. The objects we study range from industrial manufacturing devices to socially-intelligent robots (SIRs), and our disciplinary frameworks include humanities-oriented approaches –cultural anthropology and graphic design in particular—as well as cybernetics and computational sciences. We will examine the cultural significance of two SIRs portrayed in pop culture, analyze the socio-technical history of autonomous devices such as the master-slave circuit, and explore the ways in which such observations might contribute to efforts such as participatory design (discussed here in terms of Bennett’s “interactive aesthetics”). We conclude with a recent case study in which racial identity and robot design had direct intersections. Like Haraway and Latour, we aim to prevent either technocentric or human-centric perspectives from dominating the analysis. It is our hope that more democratic and sustainable ways of designing and using robots can emerge from this view of hybridity and co-evolution between social and technical worlds.
topic Estética interactiva, historia de dispositivos autónomos, robots socialmente interactivos.
url http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/48254
work_keys_str_mv AT audreybennett culturalroboticsontheintersectionsofidentityandautonomyinpeopleandmachines
AT roneglash culturalroboticsontheintersectionsofidentityandautonomyinpeopleandmachines
_version_ 1725654232818778112