Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text

This article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zinnatullina Gulshat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203
id doaj-1224ed4ba7d0490bbf9c19b3a0180e4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1224ed4ba7d0490bbf9c19b3a0180e4a2021-03-02T09:51:24ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242018-01-01500120310.1051/shsconf/20185001203shsconf_cildiah2018_01203Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary TextZinnatullina GulshatThis article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as a material for research. The object of study is anthroponyms and their immediate environment (appellatives and their combination with proper names). The novelty and topicality of the research can be attributed to the fact that it is the first attempt to study anthroponyms in particular in combination with different appellative constructions. This, in its turn, allows us to consider anthroponyms as an important structure-forming element of the literary space. The research of the onomastic layer of the literary texts, which we chose, enabled us to draw conclusions about the wide use of dependent words (they are often participles and participial constructions) amid anthroponyms. We make an attempt to reveal the peculiarities of the use and functions of such constructions within the framework of this article. It has turned out that they may contain the most significant, comprehensive information on any character. In addition, these combinations serve as vivid expressive means, reflect specificity of the writer’s artistic and creative thinking.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zinnatullina Gulshat
spellingShingle Zinnatullina Gulshat
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Zinnatullina Gulshat
author_sort Zinnatullina Gulshat
title Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
title_short Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
title_full Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
title_fullStr Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
title_full_unstemmed Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
title_sort anthroponyms and microtextology of literary text
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as a material for research. The object of study is anthroponyms and their immediate environment (appellatives and their combination with proper names). The novelty and topicality of the research can be attributed to the fact that it is the first attempt to study anthroponyms in particular in combination with different appellative constructions. This, in its turn, allows us to consider anthroponyms as an important structure-forming element of the literary space. The research of the onomastic layer of the literary texts, which we chose, enabled us to draw conclusions about the wide use of dependent words (they are often participles and participial constructions) amid anthroponyms. We make an attempt to reveal the peculiarities of the use and functions of such constructions within the framework of this article. It has turned out that they may contain the most significant, comprehensive information on any character. In addition, these combinations serve as vivid expressive means, reflect specificity of the writer’s artistic and creative thinking.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203
work_keys_str_mv AT zinnatullinagulshat anthroponymsandmicrotextologyofliterarytext
_version_ 1724238310443843584