Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text
This article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | SHS Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203 |
id |
doaj-1224ed4ba7d0490bbf9c19b3a0180e4a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1224ed4ba7d0490bbf9c19b3a0180e4a2021-03-02T09:51:24ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242018-01-01500120310.1051/shsconf/20185001203shsconf_cildiah2018_01203Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary TextZinnatullina GulshatThis article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as a material for research. The object of study is anthroponyms and their immediate environment (appellatives and their combination with proper names). The novelty and topicality of the research can be attributed to the fact that it is the first attempt to study anthroponyms in particular in combination with different appellative constructions. This, in its turn, allows us to consider anthroponyms as an important structure-forming element of the literary space. The research of the onomastic layer of the literary texts, which we chose, enabled us to draw conclusions about the wide use of dependent words (they are often participles and participial constructions) amid anthroponyms. We make an attempt to reveal the peculiarities of the use and functions of such constructions within the framework of this article. It has turned out that they may contain the most significant, comprehensive information on any character. In addition, these combinations serve as vivid expressive means, reflect specificity of the writer’s artistic and creative thinking.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zinnatullina Gulshat |
spellingShingle |
Zinnatullina Gulshat Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text SHS Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Zinnatullina Gulshat |
author_sort |
Zinnatullina Gulshat |
title |
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text |
title_short |
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text |
title_full |
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text |
title_fullStr |
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anthroponyms and Microtextology of Literary Text |
title_sort |
anthroponyms and microtextology of literary text |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
SHS Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-2424 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This article deals with the basic types and functions of adjective constructions “accompanying” proper names in the literary text. This article continues research in the field of poetic onomastics. Stories and short novels by canonical Tatar writers such as A. Yeniki, M. Amir and F. Khusni served as a material for research. The object of study is anthroponyms and their immediate environment (appellatives and their combination with proper names). The novelty and topicality of the research can be attributed to the fact that it is the first attempt to study anthroponyms in particular in combination with different appellative constructions. This, in its turn, allows us to consider anthroponyms as an important structure-forming element of the literary space. The research of the onomastic layer of the literary texts, which we chose, enabled us to draw conclusions about the wide use of dependent words (they are often participles and participial constructions) amid anthroponyms. We make an attempt to reveal the peculiarities of the use and functions of such constructions within the framework of this article. It has turned out that they may contain the most significant, comprehensive information on any character. In addition, these combinations serve as vivid expressive means, reflect specificity of the writer’s artistic and creative thinking. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001203 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zinnatullinagulshat anthroponymsandmicrotextologyofliterarytext |
_version_ |
1724238310443843584 |