Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor

Introduction. To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. Material and Methods. A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda Hjertberg, Eva Uustal, Sofia Pihl, Marie Blomberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949
id doaj-121e4b0e68e642f883dd068abb6d809c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-121e4b0e68e642f883dd068abb6d809c2020-11-24T22:16:40ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412018-01-01201810.1155/2018/15329491532949Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term LaborLinda Hjertberg0Eva Uustal1Sofia Pihl2Marie Blomberg3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, SwedenIntroduction. To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. Material and Methods. A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman’s medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. Results. The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p=0.018). Conclusions. The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linda Hjertberg
Eva Uustal
Sofia Pihl
Marie Blomberg
spellingShingle Linda Hjertberg
Eva Uustal
Sofia Pihl
Marie Blomberg
Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
BioMed Research International
author_facet Linda Hjertberg
Eva Uustal
Sofia Pihl
Marie Blomberg
author_sort Linda Hjertberg
title Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_short Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_full Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_fullStr Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_full_unstemmed Maternal Body Mass Index and Anovaginal Distance in Active Phase of Term Labor
title_sort maternal body mass index and anovaginal distance in active phase of term labor
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction. To evaluate if there was a difference in the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured by transperineal ultrasound between obese and normal weight women. Material and Methods. A prospective observational study including 207 primiparous women at term in first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound with a vaginal probe was used to measure the AVD. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics potentially associated with perineal thickness were extracted from woman’s medical records. The participants were divided into three BMI groups based on maternal weight in early pregnancy: normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30). Obese and overweight women were compared with normal weight women regarding the AVD. Results. The mean AVD was 24.3, 24.9, and 27.0 mm in the normal weight, overweight, and obesity group, respectively. There were no group differences in background characteristics. The AVD was significantly longer in obese women compared with normal weight women (p=0.018). Conclusions. The observed longer AVD in obese women might be protective of the anal sphincter complex, explaining lower rates of anal sphincter injuries in this group. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether the length of the AVD plays a role in the risk assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial registration ID is NCT03149965.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1532949
work_keys_str_mv AT lindahjertberg maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT evauustal maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT sofiapihl maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
AT marieblomberg maternalbodymassindexandanovaginaldistanceinactivephaseoftermlabor
_version_ 1725788457157001216