Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the inter-rater reliability of the thumb localizing test (TLT) and its validity against quantitative measures of proprioception.<h4>Methods</h4>The TLT was assessed by two raters in a standardized manner in 40 individuals with hemiparetic stroke....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eri Otaka, Yohei Otaka, Shoko Kasuga, Atsuko Nishimoto, Kotaro Yamazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Junichi Ushiba, Meigen Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236437
id doaj-1218f89f451146119d6cd4818f53f3e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1218f89f451146119d6cd4818f53f3e22021-03-04T11:15:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01157e023643710.1371/journal.pone.0236437Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.Eri OtakaYohei OtakaShoko KasugaAtsuko NishimotoKotaro YamazakiMichiyuki KawakamiJunichi UshibaMeigen Liu<h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the inter-rater reliability of the thumb localizing test (TLT) and its validity against quantitative measures of proprioception.<h4>Methods</h4>The TLT was assessed by two raters in a standardized manner in 40 individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Inter-rater reliability was examined with weighted Kappa. For the quantitative measures, a bimanual matching task in a planar robotic device was performed. Without vision, each participant moved the unaffected hand to the perceived mirrored location of the affected hand, which was passively moved by the robot. Three measures were taken after 54 trials: Variability, trial-to-trial variability of the mirrored-matched locations; Area, the ratio of the area enclosed by the active hand relative to the passive hand; and Shift, systematic shifts between the passive and active hands. The correlation between the TLT and each robotic measure was examined with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.<h4>Results</h4>The overall weighted kappa of the TLT was 0.84 (P<0.001). The TLT correlated highly with Area (r = -0.71, P<0.001) and moderately with Variability (r = 0.40, P = 0.011). No significant correlation was found between the TLT and Shift.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The TLT had a high inter-rater reliability, and was validated against quantitative measures of proprioception reflecting the perceived area of movement and variability of the limb location.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236437
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eri Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Shoko Kasuga
Atsuko Nishimoto
Kotaro Yamazaki
Michiyuki Kawakami
Junichi Ushiba
Meigen Liu
spellingShingle Eri Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Shoko Kasuga
Atsuko Nishimoto
Kotaro Yamazaki
Michiyuki Kawakami
Junichi Ushiba
Meigen Liu
Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eri Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Shoko Kasuga
Atsuko Nishimoto
Kotaro Yamazaki
Michiyuki Kawakami
Junichi Ushiba
Meigen Liu
author_sort Eri Otaka
title Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
title_short Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
title_full Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
title_fullStr Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
title_sort reliability of the thumb localizing test and its validity against quantitative measures with a robotic device in patients with hemiparetic stroke.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the inter-rater reliability of the thumb localizing test (TLT) and its validity against quantitative measures of proprioception.<h4>Methods</h4>The TLT was assessed by two raters in a standardized manner in 40 individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Inter-rater reliability was examined with weighted Kappa. For the quantitative measures, a bimanual matching task in a planar robotic device was performed. Without vision, each participant moved the unaffected hand to the perceived mirrored location of the affected hand, which was passively moved by the robot. Three measures were taken after 54 trials: Variability, trial-to-trial variability of the mirrored-matched locations; Area, the ratio of the area enclosed by the active hand relative to the passive hand; and Shift, systematic shifts between the passive and active hands. The correlation between the TLT and each robotic measure was examined with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.<h4>Results</h4>The overall weighted kappa of the TLT was 0.84 (P<0.001). The TLT correlated highly with Area (r = -0.71, P<0.001) and moderately with Variability (r = 0.40, P = 0.011). No significant correlation was found between the TLT and Shift.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The TLT had a high inter-rater reliability, and was validated against quantitative measures of proprioception reflecting the perceived area of movement and variability of the limb location.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236437
work_keys_str_mv AT eriotaka reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT yoheiotaka reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT shokokasuga reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT atsukonishimoto reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT kotaroyamazaki reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT michiyukikawakami reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT junichiushiba reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
AT meigenliu reliabilityofthethumblocalizingtestanditsvalidityagainstquantitativemeasureswitharoboticdeviceinpatientswithhemipareticstroke
_version_ 1714804234071834624