Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations

CO2 capture and utilization (CCU) has been widely considered as a potential solution to overcome global warming. Conversion of CO2 into methanol is an interesting option to transform waste into value-added chemical while also reducing greenhouse gases emissions in the atmosphere. In this paper, util...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fadilla Noor Rahma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Diponegoro University 2019-10-01
Series:Reaktor
Online Access:https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/reaktor/article/view/25573
id doaj-120d20cfb25d42b4b69962e8de9ac282
record_format Article
spelling doaj-120d20cfb25d42b4b69962e8de9ac2822020-11-25T02:09:54ZengDiponegoro UniversityReaktor0852-07982407-59732019-10-0119313113510.14710/reaktor.19.3.131-13515613Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic ConfigurationsFadilla Noor Rahma0Universitas Islam IndonesiaCO2 capture and utilization (CCU) has been widely considered as a potential solution to overcome global warming. Conversion of CO2 into methanol is an interesting option to transform waste into value-added chemical while also reducing greenhouse gases emissions in the atmosphere. In this paper, utilization of CO2 into methanol was simulated using Aspen Plus software. The reaction between CO2 and H2 to produce methanol and water was carried out in a simulated fixed-bed reactor with Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 commercial catalyst, following LHHW (Langmuir – Hinshelwood – Hougen – Watson) kinetic model. Isothermal and adiabatic reactor configurations were compared under similar feed conditions and the concentration profile along the reactor was observed. The result showed that isothermal configuration converted 3.23% more CO2 and provided 16.34% higher methanol yield compared to the adiabatic reactor. Feed inlet temperature variation was applied and the effect to methanol production on both configurations was studied. The highest methanol yield for adiabatic and isothermal reactor was obtained at 200 oC and 240 oC respectively.https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/reaktor/article/view/25573
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fadilla Noor Rahma
spellingShingle Fadilla Noor Rahma
Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
Reaktor
author_facet Fadilla Noor Rahma
author_sort Fadilla Noor Rahma
title Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
title_short Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
title_full Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
title_fullStr Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of CO2 Conversion into Methanol in Fixed-bed Reactors: Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Configurations
title_sort simulation of co2 conversion into methanol in fixed-bed reactors: comparison of isothermal and adiabatic configurations
publisher Diponegoro University
series Reaktor
issn 0852-0798
2407-5973
publishDate 2019-10-01
description CO2 capture and utilization (CCU) has been widely considered as a potential solution to overcome global warming. Conversion of CO2 into methanol is an interesting option to transform waste into value-added chemical while also reducing greenhouse gases emissions in the atmosphere. In this paper, utilization of CO2 into methanol was simulated using Aspen Plus software. The reaction between CO2 and H2 to produce methanol and water was carried out in a simulated fixed-bed reactor with Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 commercial catalyst, following LHHW (Langmuir – Hinshelwood – Hougen – Watson) kinetic model. Isothermal and adiabatic reactor configurations were compared under similar feed conditions and the concentration profile along the reactor was observed. The result showed that isothermal configuration converted 3.23% more CO2 and provided 16.34% higher methanol yield compared to the adiabatic reactor. Feed inlet temperature variation was applied and the effect to methanol production on both configurations was studied. The highest methanol yield for adiabatic and isothermal reactor was obtained at 200 oC and 240 oC respectively.
url https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/reaktor/article/view/25573
work_keys_str_mv AT fadillanoorrahma simulationofco2conversionintomethanolinfixedbedreactorscomparisonofisothermalandadiabaticconfigurations
_version_ 1724921736238989312