Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.

Processing of tactile stimuli requires both localising the stimuli on the body surface and combining this information with a representation of the current posture. When tactile stimuli are applied to crossed hands, the system first assumes a prototypical (e.g. uncrossed) positioning of the limbs. Re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyanne M de Haan, Helen A Anema, H Chris Dijkerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3454417?pdf=render
id doaj-11f4eb7817ee42319d7114c1a877d406
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11f4eb7817ee42319d7114c1a877d4062020-11-25T01:42:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4540810.1371/journal.pone.0045408Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.Alyanne M de HaanHelen A AnemaH Chris DijkermanProcessing of tactile stimuli requires both localising the stimuli on the body surface and combining this information with a representation of the current posture. When tactile stimuli are applied to crossed hands, the system first assumes a prototypical (e.g. uncrossed) positioning of the limbs. Remapping to include the crossed posture occurs within about 300 ms. Since fingers have been suggested to be represented in a mainly somatotopic reference frame we were interested in how the processing of tactile stimuli applied to the fingers would be affected by an unusual posture of the fingers. We asked participants to report the direction of movement of two tactile stimuli, applied successively to the crossed or uncrossed index and middle fingers of one hand at different inter-stimulus intervals (15 to 700 ms). Participants almost consistently reported perceiving the stimulus direction as opposite to what it was in the fingers crossed condition, even with SOAs of 700 ms, suggesting that on average they did not incorporate the unusual relative finger positions. Therefore our results are in agreement with the idea that, by default, the processing of tactile stimuli assumes a prototypical positioning of body parts. However, in contrast to what is generally found with tactile perception with crossed hands, performance did not improve with SOAs as long as 700 ms. This suggests that the localization of stimuli in a somatotopic reference and the integration of this representation with postural information are two separate processes that apply differently to the hands and fingers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3454417?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alyanne M de Haan
Helen A Anema
H Chris Dijkerman
spellingShingle Alyanne M de Haan
Helen A Anema
H Chris Dijkerman
Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alyanne M de Haan
Helen A Anema
H Chris Dijkerman
author_sort Alyanne M de Haan
title Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
title_short Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
title_full Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
title_fullStr Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
title_full_unstemmed Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
title_sort fingers crossed! an investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Processing of tactile stimuli requires both localising the stimuli on the body surface and combining this information with a representation of the current posture. When tactile stimuli are applied to crossed hands, the system first assumes a prototypical (e.g. uncrossed) positioning of the limbs. Remapping to include the crossed posture occurs within about 300 ms. Since fingers have been suggested to be represented in a mainly somatotopic reference frame we were interested in how the processing of tactile stimuli applied to the fingers would be affected by an unusual posture of the fingers. We asked participants to report the direction of movement of two tactile stimuli, applied successively to the crossed or uncrossed index and middle fingers of one hand at different inter-stimulus intervals (15 to 700 ms). Participants almost consistently reported perceiving the stimulus direction as opposite to what it was in the fingers crossed condition, even with SOAs of 700 ms, suggesting that on average they did not incorporate the unusual relative finger positions. Therefore our results are in agreement with the idea that, by default, the processing of tactile stimuli assumes a prototypical positioning of body parts. However, in contrast to what is generally found with tactile perception with crossed hands, performance did not improve with SOAs as long as 700 ms. This suggests that the localization of stimuli in a somatotopic reference and the integration of this representation with postural information are two separate processes that apply differently to the hands and fingers.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3454417?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alyannemdehaan fingerscrossedaninvestigationofsomatotopicrepresentationsusingspatialdirectionaljudgements
AT helenaanema fingerscrossedaninvestigationofsomatotopicrepresentationsusingspatialdirectionaljudgements
AT hchrisdijkerman fingerscrossedaninvestigationofsomatotopicrepresentationsusingspatialdirectionaljudgements
_version_ 1725035147099635712