Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
Abstract Background Access to high-quality antenatal care services has been shown to be beneficial for maternal and child health. In 2016, the WHO published evidence-based recommendations for antenatal care that aim to improve utilization, quality of care, and the patient experience. Prior research...
Main Authors: | Alex Harsha Bangura, Isha Nirola, Poshan Thapa, David Citrin, Bishal Belbase, Bhawana Bogati, Nirmala B.K., Sonu Khadka, Lal Kunwar, Scott Halliday, Nandini Choudhury, Ryan Schwarz, Mukesh Adhikari, S. P. Kalaunee, Sharon Rising, Duncan Maru, Sheela Maru |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4 |
Similar Items
-
The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
by: Poshan Thapa, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico
by: Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Effects of CenteringPregnancy on Pregnancy Outcomes and Health Disparities in Racial Groups versus Traditional Prenatal Care
by: Adrianne Smith, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Assessing Adverse Childhood Experiences during Pregnancy: Evidence toward a Best Practice
by: Megan W. Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women’s experiences
by: Angele Musabyimana, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)