Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate

The present paper aims to describe copulas in Kriyol from a semantic-syntactic perspective and to compare them to copulas in the other Upper Guinea Creoles and certain substrate languages. We will show that in Kriyol the selection of the copula from the paradigm principally depends on two factors: i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chiara Truppi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-9-2019/copulas-in-contact-kriyol-upper-guinea-creoles
id doaj-11d9c6f3520e43f19e036bd893696725
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11d9c6f3520e43f19e036bd8936967252020-12-08T22:34:07ZengAssociação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e EspanholaJournal of Ibero-Romance Creoles2184-53602019-07-019185114Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate Chiara Truppi0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-7107Universidade de LisboaThe present paper aims to describe copulas in Kriyol from a semantic-syntactic perspective and to compare them to copulas in the other Upper Guinea Creoles and certain substrate languages. We will show that in Kriyol the selection of the copula from the paradigm principally depends on two factors: i) the predicate type, and ii) the aspect and tense properties of the clause. The former is responsible for the split encoding of nominal and locative predication. In particular, the copula sta occurs with locative predicates, while we find several suppletive forms for nominal predication, each with its semantic-syntactic function, namely i, the null copula Ø, sedu, and (y)era. Aspect and tense play a crucial role in the selection of the copula with nominal predicates. Furthermore, we will compare Kriyol copulas to those used in the Santiago variety of Cape Verdean Creole and Casamancese Creole, as well as to copulas in Wolof (Atlantic) and Mandinka (Mande), which are mentioned in the literature as substrate languages of the Upper Guinea proto-creole. On the basis of similarities among these languages, we will argue that Wolof and Mandinka influenced the emergence of UGC system of copulas. http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-9-2019/copulas-in-contact-kriyol-upper-guinea-creolescopulaskriyolpredicate typeaspecttenseupper guinea creolessubstrate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chiara Truppi
spellingShingle Chiara Truppi
Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
copulas
kriyol
predicate type
aspect
tense
upper guinea creoles
substrate
author_facet Chiara Truppi
author_sort Chiara Truppi
title Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
title_short Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
title_full Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
title_fullStr Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
title_full_unstemmed Copulas in contact: Kriyol, Upper Guinea Creoles, and their substrate
title_sort copulas in contact: kriyol, upper guinea creoles, and their substrate
publisher Associação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola
series Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
issn 2184-5360
publishDate 2019-07-01
description The present paper aims to describe copulas in Kriyol from a semantic-syntactic perspective and to compare them to copulas in the other Upper Guinea Creoles and certain substrate languages. We will show that in Kriyol the selection of the copula from the paradigm principally depends on two factors: i) the predicate type, and ii) the aspect and tense properties of the clause. The former is responsible for the split encoding of nominal and locative predication. In particular, the copula sta occurs with locative predicates, while we find several suppletive forms for nominal predication, each with its semantic-syntactic function, namely i, the null copula Ø, sedu, and (y)era. Aspect and tense play a crucial role in the selection of the copula with nominal predicates. Furthermore, we will compare Kriyol copulas to those used in the Santiago variety of Cape Verdean Creole and Casamancese Creole, as well as to copulas in Wolof (Atlantic) and Mandinka (Mande), which are mentioned in the literature as substrate languages of the Upper Guinea proto-creole. On the basis of similarities among these languages, we will argue that Wolof and Mandinka influenced the emergence of UGC system of copulas.
topic copulas
kriyol
predicate type
aspect
tense
upper guinea creoles
substrate
url http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-9-2019/copulas-in-contact-kriyol-upper-guinea-creoles
work_keys_str_mv AT chiaratruppi copulasincontactkriyolupperguineacreolesandtheirsubstrate
_version_ 1724388847506161664