Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus
Miscanthus is a perennial grass with potential for lignocellulosic ethanol production. To ensure its utility for this purpose, breeding efforts should focus on increasing genetic diversity of the nothospecies Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) beyond the single clone used in many programs. Germplasm from...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2020-07-01
|
Series: | G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.120.401402 |
id |
doaj-11d0ca53bdb140a0af9e3fad48d13752 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-11d0ca53bdb140a0af9e3fad48d137522021-07-02T12:59:28ZengOxford University PressG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics2160-18362020-07-011072465247610.1534/g3.120.40140230Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in MiscanthusMarcus O. OlatoyeLindsay V. ClarkNicholas R. LabonteHongxu DongMaria S. DwiyantiKossonou G. AnzouaJoe E. BrummerBimal K. GhimireElena DzyubenkoNikolay DzyubenkoLarisa BagmetAndrey SabitovPavel ChebukinKatarzyna GłowackaKweon HeoXiaoli JinHironori NaganoJunhua PengChang Y. YuJi H. YooHua ZhaoStephen P. LongToshihiko YamadaErik J. SacksAlexander E. LipkaMiscanthus is a perennial grass with potential for lignocellulosic ethanol production. To ensure its utility for this purpose, breeding efforts should focus on increasing genetic diversity of the nothospecies Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) beyond the single clone used in many programs. Germplasm from the corresponding parental species M. sinensis (Msi) and M. sacchariflorus (Msa) could theoretically be used as training sets for genomic prediction of M×g clones with optimal genomic estimated breeding values for biofuel traits. To this end, we first showed that subpopulation structure makes a substantial contribution to the genomic selection (GS) prediction accuracies within a 538-member diversity panel of predominately Msi individuals and a 598-member diversity panels of Msa individuals. We then assessed the ability of these two diversity panels to train GS models that predict breeding values in an interspecific diploid 216-member M×g F2 panel. Low and negative prediction accuracies were observed when various subsets of the two diversity panels were used to train these GS models. To overcome the drawback of having only one interspecific M×g F2 panel available, we also evaluated prediction accuracies for traits simulated in 50 simulated interspecific M×g F2 panels derived from different sets of Msi and diploid Msa parents. The results revealed that genetic architectures with common causal mutations across Msi and Msa yielded the highest prediction accuracies. Ultimately, these results suggest that the ideal training set should contain the same causal mutations segregating within interspecific M×g populations, and thus efforts should be undertaken to ensure that individuals in the training and validation sets are as closely related as possible.http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.120.401402miscanthusprediction accuracygenomic selectionpopulation structuregenpredshared data resources |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marcus O. Olatoye Lindsay V. Clark Nicholas R. Labonte Hongxu Dong Maria S. Dwiyanti Kossonou G. Anzoua Joe E. Brummer Bimal K. Ghimire Elena Dzyubenko Nikolay Dzyubenko Larisa Bagmet Andrey Sabitov Pavel Chebukin Katarzyna Głowacka Kweon Heo Xiaoli Jin Hironori Nagano Junhua Peng Chang Y. Yu Ji H. Yoo Hua Zhao Stephen P. Long Toshihiko Yamada Erik J. Sacks Alexander E. Lipka |
spellingShingle |
Marcus O. Olatoye Lindsay V. Clark Nicholas R. Labonte Hongxu Dong Maria S. Dwiyanti Kossonou G. Anzoua Joe E. Brummer Bimal K. Ghimire Elena Dzyubenko Nikolay Dzyubenko Larisa Bagmet Andrey Sabitov Pavel Chebukin Katarzyna Głowacka Kweon Heo Xiaoli Jin Hironori Nagano Junhua Peng Chang Y. Yu Ji H. Yoo Hua Zhao Stephen P. Long Toshihiko Yamada Erik J. Sacks Alexander E. Lipka Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics miscanthus prediction accuracy genomic selection population structure genpred shared data resources |
author_facet |
Marcus O. Olatoye Lindsay V. Clark Nicholas R. Labonte Hongxu Dong Maria S. Dwiyanti Kossonou G. Anzoua Joe E. Brummer Bimal K. Ghimire Elena Dzyubenko Nikolay Dzyubenko Larisa Bagmet Andrey Sabitov Pavel Chebukin Katarzyna Głowacka Kweon Heo Xiaoli Jin Hironori Nagano Junhua Peng Chang Y. Yu Ji H. Yoo Hua Zhao Stephen P. Long Toshihiko Yamada Erik J. Sacks Alexander E. Lipka |
author_sort |
Marcus O. Olatoye |
title |
Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus |
title_short |
Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus |
title_full |
Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus |
title_fullStr |
Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus |
title_sort |
training population optimization for genomic selection in miscanthus |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
series |
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics |
issn |
2160-1836 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Miscanthus is a perennial grass with potential for lignocellulosic ethanol production. To ensure its utility for this purpose, breeding efforts should focus on increasing genetic diversity of the nothospecies Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) beyond the single clone used in many programs. Germplasm from the corresponding parental species M. sinensis (Msi) and M. sacchariflorus (Msa) could theoretically be used as training sets for genomic prediction of M×g clones with optimal genomic estimated breeding values for biofuel traits. To this end, we first showed that subpopulation structure makes a substantial contribution to the genomic selection (GS) prediction accuracies within a 538-member diversity panel of predominately Msi individuals and a 598-member diversity panels of Msa individuals. We then assessed the ability of these two diversity panels to train GS models that predict breeding values in an interspecific diploid 216-member M×g F2 panel. Low and negative prediction accuracies were observed when various subsets of the two diversity panels were used to train these GS models. To overcome the drawback of having only one interspecific M×g F2 panel available, we also evaluated prediction accuracies for traits simulated in 50 simulated interspecific M×g F2 panels derived from different sets of Msi and diploid Msa parents. The results revealed that genetic architectures with common causal mutations across Msi and Msa yielded the highest prediction accuracies. Ultimately, these results suggest that the ideal training set should contain the same causal mutations segregating within interspecific M×g populations, and thus efforts should be undertaken to ensure that individuals in the training and validation sets are as closely related as possible. |
topic |
miscanthus prediction accuracy genomic selection population structure genpred shared data resources |
url |
http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.120.401402 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcusoolatoye trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT lindsayvclark trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT nicholasrlabonte trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT hongxudong trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT mariasdwiyanti trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT kossonouganzoua trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT joeebrummer trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT bimalkghimire trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT elenadzyubenko trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT nikolaydzyubenko trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT larisabagmet trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT andreysabitov trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT pavelchebukin trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT katarzynagłowacka trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT kweonheo trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT xiaolijin trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT hironorinagano trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT junhuapeng trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT changyyu trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT jihyoo trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT huazhao trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT stephenplong trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT toshihikoyamada trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT erikjsacks trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus AT alexanderelipka trainingpopulationoptimizationforgenomicselectioninmiscanthus |
_version_ |
1721329511445823488 |