Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials have highlighted the cardiovascular risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in high doses and sometimes atypical settings. Here, we provide estimates of the comparative risks with individual NSAIDs at typical doses in community settings. METHODS AND FIND...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia McGettigan, David Henry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-09-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3181230?pdf=render
id doaj-11cbec7ae67048ebbe8cab1c85e49196
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11cbec7ae67048ebbe8cab1c85e491962020-11-25T01:17:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762011-09-0189e100109810.1371/journal.pmed.1001098Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.Patricia McGettiganDavid HenryBACKGROUND: Randomised trials have highlighted the cardiovascular risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in high doses and sometimes atypical settings. Here, we provide estimates of the comparative risks with individual NSAIDs at typical doses in community settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a systematic review of community-based controlled observational studies. We conducted comprehensive literature searches, extracted adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates, and pooled the estimates for major cardiovascular events associated with use of individual NSAIDs, in different doses, and in populations with low and high background risks of cardiovascular events. We also compared individual drugs in pair-wise (within study) analyses, generating ratios of RRs (RRRs). Thirty case-control studies included 184,946 cardiovascular events, and 21 cohort studies described outcomes in >2.7 million exposed individuals. Of the extensively studied drugs (ten or more studies), the highest overall risks were seen with rofecoxib, 1.45 (95% CI 1.33, 1.59), and diclofenac, 1.40 (1.27, 1.55), and the lowest with ibuprofen, 1.18 (1.11, 1.25), and naproxen, 1.09 (1.02, 1.16). In a sub-set of studies, risk was elevated with low doses of rofecoxib, 1.37 (1.20, 1.57), celecoxib, 1.26 (1.09, 1.47), and diclofenac, 1.22 (1.12, 1.33), and rose in each case with higher doses. Ibuprofen risk was seen only with higher doses. Naproxen was risk-neutral at all doses. Of the less studied drugs etoricoxib, 2.05 (1.45, 2.88), etodolac, 1.55 (1.28, 1.87), and indomethacin, 1.30 (1.19, 1.41), had the highest risks. In pair-wise comparisons, etoricoxib had a higher RR than ibuprofen, RRR = 1.68 (99% CI 1.14, 2.49), and naproxen, RRR = 1.75 (1.16, 2.64); etodolac was not significantly different from naproxen and ibuprofen. Naproxen had a significantly lower risk than ibuprofen, RRR = 0.92 (0.87, 0.99). RR estimates were constant with different background risks for cardiovascular disease and rose early in the course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that among widely used NSAIDs, naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen are least likely to increase cardiovascular risk. Diclofenac in doses available without prescription elevates risk. The data for etoricoxib were sparse, but in pair-wise comparisons this drug had a significantly higher RR than naproxen or ibuprofen. Indomethacin is an older, rather toxic drug, and the evidence on cardiovascular risk casts doubt on its continued clinical use. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3181230?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patricia McGettigan
David Henry
spellingShingle Patricia McGettigan
David Henry
Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
PLoS Medicine
author_facet Patricia McGettigan
David Henry
author_sort Patricia McGettigan
title Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
title_short Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
title_full Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
title_fullStr Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
title_sort cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Medicine
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
publishDate 2011-09-01
description BACKGROUND: Randomised trials have highlighted the cardiovascular risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in high doses and sometimes atypical settings. Here, we provide estimates of the comparative risks with individual NSAIDs at typical doses in community settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a systematic review of community-based controlled observational studies. We conducted comprehensive literature searches, extracted adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates, and pooled the estimates for major cardiovascular events associated with use of individual NSAIDs, in different doses, and in populations with low and high background risks of cardiovascular events. We also compared individual drugs in pair-wise (within study) analyses, generating ratios of RRs (RRRs). Thirty case-control studies included 184,946 cardiovascular events, and 21 cohort studies described outcomes in >2.7 million exposed individuals. Of the extensively studied drugs (ten or more studies), the highest overall risks were seen with rofecoxib, 1.45 (95% CI 1.33, 1.59), and diclofenac, 1.40 (1.27, 1.55), and the lowest with ibuprofen, 1.18 (1.11, 1.25), and naproxen, 1.09 (1.02, 1.16). In a sub-set of studies, risk was elevated with low doses of rofecoxib, 1.37 (1.20, 1.57), celecoxib, 1.26 (1.09, 1.47), and diclofenac, 1.22 (1.12, 1.33), and rose in each case with higher doses. Ibuprofen risk was seen only with higher doses. Naproxen was risk-neutral at all doses. Of the less studied drugs etoricoxib, 2.05 (1.45, 2.88), etodolac, 1.55 (1.28, 1.87), and indomethacin, 1.30 (1.19, 1.41), had the highest risks. In pair-wise comparisons, etoricoxib had a higher RR than ibuprofen, RRR = 1.68 (99% CI 1.14, 2.49), and naproxen, RRR = 1.75 (1.16, 2.64); etodolac was not significantly different from naproxen and ibuprofen. Naproxen had a significantly lower risk than ibuprofen, RRR = 0.92 (0.87, 0.99). RR estimates were constant with different background risks for cardiovascular disease and rose early in the course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that among widely used NSAIDs, naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen are least likely to increase cardiovascular risk. Diclofenac in doses available without prescription elevates risk. The data for etoricoxib were sparse, but in pair-wise comparisons this drug had a significantly higher RR than naproxen or ibuprofen. Indomethacin is an older, rather toxic drug, and the evidence on cardiovascular risk casts doubt on its continued clinical use. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3181230?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciamcgettigan cardiovascularriskwithnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugssystematicreviewofpopulationbasedcontrolledobservationalstudies
AT davidhenry cardiovascularriskwithnonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugssystematicreviewofpopulationbasedcontrolledobservationalstudies
_version_ 1725144982042443776