Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion

In this article we present some reflections from a conceptual analysis and discussion that are part of a wider research intending to understand and questioning current ways of expertise in educational policy-making, namely, concerning to the characteristics of the expert actors and the kind of knowl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carina Coelho, Manuela Terrasêca, José Alberto Correia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2016-01-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2103
id doaj-1194db858bfa47369c17171d0d18e5e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1194db858bfa47369c17171d0d18e5e32020-11-25T03:15:48ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412016-01-0124010.14507/epaa.24.21031448Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussionCarina Coelho0Manuela Terrasêca1José Alberto Correia2University of PortoUniversity of PortoUniversity of PortoIn this article we present some reflections from a conceptual analysis and discussion that are part of a wider research intending to understand and questioning current ways of expertise in educational policy-making, namely, concerning to the characteristics of the expert actors and the kind of knowledge recognized as valid to legitimize political decisions. Starting from a contextualization of the research interests in the recent (last decades) changes on modes of governance and policy decision-making, we synthesize and try to put in discussion the perspective of some authors, in an approach to the concepts of expert and expertise that take as particular reference the articulations established between these and other concepts, professional fields and nearby spheres of action. Some considerations that have resulted from this analysis indicate an interpretative variability with such amplitude that allows the inclusion of opposite concepts for expert, especially if we consider knowledge formalization level and knowledge specialization level. We also provide some clues about the pertinence of analyzing political decision-making processes through an approach of the expert as a collective figure.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2103expertexpertisetipos de conhecimentoprodução de políticas públicasdecisão políticaciência e políticamodos de governação
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carina Coelho
Manuela Terrasêca
José Alberto Correia
spellingShingle Carina Coelho
Manuela Terrasêca
José Alberto Correia
Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
Education Policy Analysis Archives
expert
expertise
tipos de conhecimento
produção de políticas públicas
decisão política
ciência e política
modos de governação
author_facet Carina Coelho
Manuela Terrasêca
José Alberto Correia
author_sort Carina Coelho
title Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
title_short Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
title_full Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
title_fullStr Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
title_full_unstemmed Types of expertise in political decision-making in education: Contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
title_sort types of expertise in political decision-making in education: contributions from a theoretical and conceptual discussion
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2016-01-01
description In this article we present some reflections from a conceptual analysis and discussion that are part of a wider research intending to understand and questioning current ways of expertise in educational policy-making, namely, concerning to the characteristics of the expert actors and the kind of knowledge recognized as valid to legitimize political decisions. Starting from a contextualization of the research interests in the recent (last decades) changes on modes of governance and policy decision-making, we synthesize and try to put in discussion the perspective of some authors, in an approach to the concepts of expert and expertise that take as particular reference the articulations established between these and other concepts, professional fields and nearby spheres of action. Some considerations that have resulted from this analysis indicate an interpretative variability with such amplitude that allows the inclusion of opposite concepts for expert, especially if we consider knowledge formalization level and knowledge specialization level. We also provide some clues about the pertinence of analyzing political decision-making processes through an approach of the expert as a collective figure.
topic expert
expertise
tipos de conhecimento
produção de políticas públicas
decisão política
ciência e política
modos de governação
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2103
work_keys_str_mv AT carinacoelho typesofexpertiseinpoliticaldecisionmakingineducationcontributionsfromatheoreticalandconceptualdiscussion
AT manuelaterraseca typesofexpertiseinpoliticaldecisionmakingineducationcontributionsfromatheoreticalandconceptualdiscussion
AT josealbertocorreia typesofexpertiseinpoliticaldecisionmakingineducationcontributionsfromatheoreticalandconceptualdiscussion
_version_ 1724637421215154176