Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials

Abstract The mechanical properties of soft materials used in the biomedical field play an important role on their performance. In the field of tissue engineering, it is known that cells sense the mechanical properties of their environment, however some materials, such as Sylard 184 PDMS (poly(dimeth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Megone, N. Roohpour, J. E. Gautrot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24671-x
id doaj-1187bbb8a8924173b19b57954dc59fc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1187bbb8a8924173b19b57954dc59fc82020-12-08T04:58:03ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-04-018111010.1038/s41598-018-24671-xImpact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterialsW. Megone0N. Roohpour1J. E. Gautrot2Queen Mary University of London, Mile End RoadConsumer Healthcare R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, St George’s Avenue, WeybridgeQueen Mary University of London, Mile End RoadAbstract The mechanical properties of soft materials used in the biomedical field play an important role on their performance. In the field of tissue engineering, it is known that cells sense the mechanical properties of their environment, however some materials, such as Sylard 184 PDMS (poly(dimethylsiloxane)), have failed to elicit such response. It was proposed that differences in the mechanical properties of such soft materials, at different scales, could account for these discrepancies. Indeed, the variation in the elastic moduli obtained for soft materials characterised at different scales can span several orders of magnitude. This called for a side-by-side comparison of the mechanical behaviour of soft materials at different scales. Here we use indentation, rheology and atomic force microscopy nanoidentation (using different tip geometries) to characterise the mechanical properties of PDMS, poly(acrylamide) (PAAm) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrogels at different length scales. Our results highlight the importance of surface adhesion and the resulting changes in contact area, and sample microstructural heterogeneity, in particular for the mechanical characterisation of ultra-soft substrates at the nano- to micro-scale.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24671-x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author W. Megone
N. Roohpour
J. E. Gautrot
spellingShingle W. Megone
N. Roohpour
J. E. Gautrot
Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
Scientific Reports
author_facet W. Megone
N. Roohpour
J. E. Gautrot
author_sort W. Megone
title Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
title_short Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
title_full Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
title_fullStr Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
title_full_unstemmed Impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
title_sort impact of surface adhesion and sample heterogeneity on the multiscale mechanical characterisation of soft biomaterials
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract The mechanical properties of soft materials used in the biomedical field play an important role on their performance. In the field of tissue engineering, it is known that cells sense the mechanical properties of their environment, however some materials, such as Sylard 184 PDMS (poly(dimethylsiloxane)), have failed to elicit such response. It was proposed that differences in the mechanical properties of such soft materials, at different scales, could account for these discrepancies. Indeed, the variation in the elastic moduli obtained for soft materials characterised at different scales can span several orders of magnitude. This called for a side-by-side comparison of the mechanical behaviour of soft materials at different scales. Here we use indentation, rheology and atomic force microscopy nanoidentation (using different tip geometries) to characterise the mechanical properties of PDMS, poly(acrylamide) (PAAm) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrogels at different length scales. Our results highlight the importance of surface adhesion and the resulting changes in contact area, and sample microstructural heterogeneity, in particular for the mechanical characterisation of ultra-soft substrates at the nano- to micro-scale.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24671-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wmegone impactofsurfaceadhesionandsampleheterogeneityonthemultiscalemechanicalcharacterisationofsoftbiomaterials
AT nroohpour impactofsurfaceadhesionandsampleheterogeneityonthemultiscalemechanicalcharacterisationofsoftbiomaterials
AT jegautrot impactofsurfaceadhesionandsampleheterogeneityonthemultiscalemechanicalcharacterisationofsoftbiomaterials
_version_ 1724391839321030656