Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis
Objective: To systematically review and compare the efficacy and posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with Gram-negative pathogens.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases were searc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Pharmacology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.707499/full |
id |
doaj-1184041cd1564c628f9aea4b236d87a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1184041cd1564c628f9aea4b236d87a42021-09-14T05:50:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-09-011210.3389/fphar.2021.707499707499Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-AnalysisDan Li0Dan Li1Dan Li2Fan Fei3Hua Yu4Xiangning Huang5Shanshan Long6Hao Zhou7Jie Zhang8School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Center Hospital of Qionglai City, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Stomotology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaObjective: To systematically review and compare the efficacy and posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with Gram-negative pathogens.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from their inception up to March 31, 2021, to obtain studies on ceftazidime-avibactam therapy versus ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the second outcomes were microbiologically negative, clinical success, and the development of resistance after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment.Results: Seventeen studies representing 1,435 patients (837 received ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and 598 received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy) were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that no statistically significant difference was found on mortality rate (Petos odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.34), microbiologically negative (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.54–1.81), and clinical success (OR =0.95, 95% CI 0.64–1.39) between ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. Although there was no difference in posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.34–1.26) in all included studies, a trend favoring the combination therapy was found (according to the pooled three studies, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.78).Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy may not have beneficial effects on mortality, microbiologically negative, and clinical success to patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A trend of posttreatment resistance occurred more likely in ceftazidime-avibactam therapy than the combination therapy. Due to the limited number of studies that can be included, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.707499/fullceftazidime-avibactam therapycombination therapycarbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogenefficacymeta-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dan Li Dan Li Dan Li Fan Fei Hua Yu Xiangning Huang Shanshan Long Hao Zhou Jie Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Dan Li Dan Li Dan Li Fan Fei Hua Yu Xiangning Huang Shanshan Long Hao Zhou Jie Zhang Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis Frontiers in Pharmacology ceftazidime-avibactam therapy combination therapy carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogen efficacy meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Dan Li Dan Li Dan Li Fan Fei Hua Yu Xiangning Huang Shanshan Long Hao Zhou Jie Zhang |
author_sort |
Dan Li |
title |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
ceftazidime-avibactam therapy versus ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens: a meta-analysis |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Pharmacology |
issn |
1663-9812 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Objective: To systematically review and compare the efficacy and posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with Gram-negative pathogens.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from their inception up to March 31, 2021, to obtain studies on ceftazidime-avibactam therapy versus ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the second outcomes were microbiologically negative, clinical success, and the development of resistance after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment.Results: Seventeen studies representing 1,435 patients (837 received ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and 598 received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy) were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that no statistically significant difference was found on mortality rate (Petos odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.34), microbiologically negative (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.54–1.81), and clinical success (OR =0.95, 95% CI 0.64–1.39) between ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. Although there was no difference in posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.34–1.26) in all included studies, a trend favoring the combination therapy was found (according to the pooled three studies, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.78).Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy may not have beneficial effects on mortality, microbiologically negative, and clinical success to patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A trend of posttreatment resistance occurred more likely in ceftazidime-avibactam therapy than the combination therapy. Due to the limited number of studies that can be included, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions. |
topic |
ceftazidime-avibactam therapy combination therapy carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogen efficacy meta-analysis |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.707499/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danli ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT danli ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT danli ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT fanfei ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT huayu ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT xiangninghuang ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT shanshanlong ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT haozhou ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis AT jiezhang ceftazidimeavibactamtherapyversusceftazidimeavibactambasedcombinationtherapyinpatientswithcarbapenemresistantgramnegativepathogensametaanalysis |
_version_ |
1717380027013660672 |