Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study

Abstract Background We investigated the feasibility of a 16-week supervised heavy resistance training program with weekly undulating periodization for individuals with persistent non-specific low-back pain (LBP). Methods Twenty-five adults with persistent non-specific LBP participated in this mixed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svein O. Tjøsvoll, Paul J. Mork, Vegard M. Iversen, Marit B. Rise, Marius S. Fimland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00181-0
id doaj-1179be71f6374611a4f95e44efb27207
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1179be71f6374611a4f95e44efb272072020-11-25T02:13:44ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472020-05-0112111210.1186/s13102-020-00181-0Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility studySvein O. Tjøsvoll0Paul J. Mork1Vegard M. Iversen2Marit B. Rise3Marius S. Fimland4Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background We investigated the feasibility of a 16-week supervised heavy resistance training program with weekly undulating periodization for individuals with persistent non-specific low-back pain (LBP). Methods Twenty-five adults with persistent non-specific LBP participated in this mixed methods feasibility study. Participants trained a whole-body program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift and pendlay row two times per week for 16 weeks. We assessed pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain self-efficacy and one-repetition maximum strength at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Three focus group interviews were conducted at the end of the program. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in outcomes, and the qualitative data was assessed using systematic text condensation. Results We observed clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity after 8 and 16 weeks of training. The mean difference on the numeric pain rating scale (0–10) in the last 2 weeks from baseline to 8 weeks was 2.6 (95% CI: 1.8–3.6) and from baseline to 16 weeks 3.4 (95% CI: 2.5–4.4). In addition, there were improvements in pain-related disability (3.9, 95% CI: 2.3–5.5), pain self-efficacy (7.7, 95% CI: 5.4–10.1) and muscle strength. In the focus group interviews, participants talked about challenges regarding technique, the importance of supervision and the advantages of periodizing the training. Perceived benefits were improved pain, daily functioning, energy level and sleep, and changes in views on physical activity. Conclusion Periodized resistance training with weekly undulating periodization is a feasible training method for this group of individuals with persistent non-specific LBP. A randomized clinical trial should assess the efficacy of such an intervention. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov / Identifier – NCT04284982 , Registered on February 24th 2020.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00181-0Heavy resistance trainingWeekly undulating periodizationPersistent non-specific low back painMixed methodsFeasibility studyNumeric pain rating scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Svein O. Tjøsvoll
Paul J. Mork
Vegard M. Iversen
Marit B. Rise
Marius S. Fimland
spellingShingle Svein O. Tjøsvoll
Paul J. Mork
Vegard M. Iversen
Marit B. Rise
Marius S. Fimland
Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Heavy resistance training
Weekly undulating periodization
Persistent non-specific low back pain
Mixed methods
Feasibility study
Numeric pain rating scale
author_facet Svein O. Tjøsvoll
Paul J. Mork
Vegard M. Iversen
Marit B. Rise
Marius S. Fimland
author_sort Svein O. Tjøsvoll
title Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_short Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_full Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_fullStr Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_sort periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
publisher BMC
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
issn 2052-1847
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background We investigated the feasibility of a 16-week supervised heavy resistance training program with weekly undulating periodization for individuals with persistent non-specific low-back pain (LBP). Methods Twenty-five adults with persistent non-specific LBP participated in this mixed methods feasibility study. Participants trained a whole-body program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift and pendlay row two times per week for 16 weeks. We assessed pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain self-efficacy and one-repetition maximum strength at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Three focus group interviews were conducted at the end of the program. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in outcomes, and the qualitative data was assessed using systematic text condensation. Results We observed clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity after 8 and 16 weeks of training. The mean difference on the numeric pain rating scale (0–10) in the last 2 weeks from baseline to 8 weeks was 2.6 (95% CI: 1.8–3.6) and from baseline to 16 weeks 3.4 (95% CI: 2.5–4.4). In addition, there were improvements in pain-related disability (3.9, 95% CI: 2.3–5.5), pain self-efficacy (7.7, 95% CI: 5.4–10.1) and muscle strength. In the focus group interviews, participants talked about challenges regarding technique, the importance of supervision and the advantages of periodizing the training. Perceived benefits were improved pain, daily functioning, energy level and sleep, and changes in views on physical activity. Conclusion Periodized resistance training with weekly undulating periodization is a feasible training method for this group of individuals with persistent non-specific LBP. A randomized clinical trial should assess the efficacy of such an intervention. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov / Identifier – NCT04284982 , Registered on February 24th 2020.
topic Heavy resistance training
Weekly undulating periodization
Persistent non-specific low back pain
Mixed methods
Feasibility study
Numeric pain rating scale
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00181-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sveinotjøsvoll periodizedresistancetrainingforpersistentnonspecificlowbackpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT pauljmork periodizedresistancetrainingforpersistentnonspecificlowbackpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT vegardmiversen periodizedresistancetrainingforpersistentnonspecificlowbackpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT maritbrise periodizedresistancetrainingforpersistentnonspecificlowbackpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT mariussfimland periodizedresistancetrainingforpersistentnonspecificlowbackpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
_version_ 1724903364777476096