Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance

This article is about contested norms in inter-national encounters in global fisheries governance. It illustrates how norms work by reconstructing the trajectory of the 1995 ‘Turbot War’ as a series of inter-national encounters among diverse sets of Canadian and European stakeholders. By unpacking t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antje Wiener
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2016-08-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/564
id doaj-1178f0a0be734b02beac68b08775beaf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1178f0a0be734b02beac68b08775beaf2020-11-24T22:52:12ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632016-08-0143203610.17645/pag.v4i3.564356Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries GovernanceAntje Wiener0Department of Political Science, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, GermanyThis article is about contested norms in inter-national encounters in global fisheries governance. It illustrates how norms work by reconstructing the trajectory of the 1995 ‘Turbot War’ as a series of inter-national encounters among diverse sets of Canadian and European stakeholders. By unpacking the contestations and identifying the norms at stake, it is suggested that what began as action at cross-purposes (i.e. each party referring to a different fundamental norm), ultimately holds the potential for fairer fisheries governance. This finding is shown by linking source and settlement of the dispute and identifying the shared concern for the balance between the right to fish and the responsibility for sustainable fisheries. The article develops a framework to elaborate on procedural details including especially the right for stakeholder access to regular contestation. It is organised in four sections: section 1 summarises the argument, section 2 presents the framework of critical norms research, section 3 reconstructs contestations of fisheries norms over the duration of the dispute, and section 4 elaborates on the dispute as a prelude to fairer fisheries governance. The latter is based on a novel conceptual focus on stakeholder access to contestation at the meso-layer of fisheries governance where organising principles are negotiated close to policy and political processes, respectively. The conclusion suggests for future research to pay more attention to the link between the ‘is’ and the ‘ought’ of norms in critical norms research in International Relations theories (IR).https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/564background experiencecontestationcultural validationfisheries governancelegitimacynormsstakeholderssustainabilityturbot warUNCLOS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antje Wiener
spellingShingle Antje Wiener
Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
Politics and Governance
background experience
contestation
cultural validation
fisheries governance
legitimacy
norms
stakeholders
sustainability
turbot war
UNCLOS
author_facet Antje Wiener
author_sort Antje Wiener
title Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
title_short Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
title_full Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
title_fullStr Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
title_full_unstemmed Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance
title_sort contested norms in inter-national encounters: the ‘turbot war’ as a prelude to fairer fisheries governance
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2016-08-01
description This article is about contested norms in inter-national encounters in global fisheries governance. It illustrates how norms work by reconstructing the trajectory of the 1995 ‘Turbot War’ as a series of inter-national encounters among diverse sets of Canadian and European stakeholders. By unpacking the contestations and identifying the norms at stake, it is suggested that what began as action at cross-purposes (i.e. each party referring to a different fundamental norm), ultimately holds the potential for fairer fisheries governance. This finding is shown by linking source and settlement of the dispute and identifying the shared concern for the balance between the right to fish and the responsibility for sustainable fisheries. The article develops a framework to elaborate on procedural details including especially the right for stakeholder access to regular contestation. It is organised in four sections: section 1 summarises the argument, section 2 presents the framework of critical norms research, section 3 reconstructs contestations of fisheries norms over the duration of the dispute, and section 4 elaborates on the dispute as a prelude to fairer fisheries governance. The latter is based on a novel conceptual focus on stakeholder access to contestation at the meso-layer of fisheries governance where organising principles are negotiated close to policy and political processes, respectively. The conclusion suggests for future research to pay more attention to the link between the ‘is’ and the ‘ought’ of norms in critical norms research in International Relations theories (IR).
topic background experience
contestation
cultural validation
fisheries governance
legitimacy
norms
stakeholders
sustainability
turbot war
UNCLOS
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/564
work_keys_str_mv AT antjewiener contestednormsininternationalencounterstheturbotwarasapreludetofairerfisheriesgovernance
_version_ 1725666603108925440