The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures

The importance of transport infrastructure for individual well-being and regional economic development and growth, but also its adverse side-effects, make a comprehensive assessment of the general appropriateness of new construction and rebuild indispensable. Assessments, however, often lack certain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christos Evangelinos, Stefan Tscharaktschiew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4977
id doaj-11707d09f8f846e6a3b4a97f5b2e8568
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11707d09f8f846e6a3b4a97f5b2e85682021-04-29T23:01:13ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-04-01134977497710.3390/su13094977The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport InfrastructuresChristos Evangelinos0Stefan Tscharaktschiew1Department Aviation Management, IU International University of Applied Sciences, 10247 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Transport & Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, GermanyThe importance of transport infrastructure for individual well-being and regional economic development and growth, but also its adverse side-effects, make a comprehensive assessment of the general appropriateness of new construction and rebuild indispensable. Assessments, however, often lack certain issues. For instance, aesthetic aspects are usually not part of the (economic) evaluation of large infrastructure projects, albeit individuals may be (positively or negatively) affected by the aesthetic ‘value’ of infrastructures. This paper proposes the aesthetic index developed by Birkhoff as a method to quantify the aesthetic impact of buildings/facilities in urban areas. To test the basic applicability of the index for transport infrastructure facilities, we apply it at first to airport terminals in Germany. We also test the suitability of the index to derive the willingness to pay for aesthetic exterior design—since market prices are easy to obtain with respect to hotel room rates—using hotel architecture as the first example. Regression results of a hedonic price model indicate a significant relationship, suggesting the basic suitability of the index to uncover consumers’ willingness to pay for an aesthetic outward appearance. We suggest further research to test the suitability of Birkhoff’s index for general urban transport infrastructures in order to derive utility-based welfare measures toward aesthetic issues. For highly controversial urban (overground) infrastructures, we propose the inclusion of an aesthetic component in cost–benefit analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4977aestheticsaesthetic measurementBirkhoff indexhedonic price analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christos Evangelinos
Stefan Tscharaktschiew
spellingShingle Christos Evangelinos
Stefan Tscharaktschiew
The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
Sustainability
aesthetics
aesthetic measurement
Birkhoff index
hedonic price analysis
author_facet Christos Evangelinos
Stefan Tscharaktschiew
author_sort Christos Evangelinos
title The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
title_short The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
title_full The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
title_fullStr The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
title_full_unstemmed The Valuation of Aesthetic Preferences and Consequences for Urban Transport Infrastructures
title_sort valuation of aesthetic preferences and consequences for urban transport infrastructures
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The importance of transport infrastructure for individual well-being and regional economic development and growth, but also its adverse side-effects, make a comprehensive assessment of the general appropriateness of new construction and rebuild indispensable. Assessments, however, often lack certain issues. For instance, aesthetic aspects are usually not part of the (economic) evaluation of large infrastructure projects, albeit individuals may be (positively or negatively) affected by the aesthetic ‘value’ of infrastructures. This paper proposes the aesthetic index developed by Birkhoff as a method to quantify the aesthetic impact of buildings/facilities in urban areas. To test the basic applicability of the index for transport infrastructure facilities, we apply it at first to airport terminals in Germany. We also test the suitability of the index to derive the willingness to pay for aesthetic exterior design—since market prices are easy to obtain with respect to hotel room rates—using hotel architecture as the first example. Regression results of a hedonic price model indicate a significant relationship, suggesting the basic suitability of the index to uncover consumers’ willingness to pay for an aesthetic outward appearance. We suggest further research to test the suitability of Birkhoff’s index for general urban transport infrastructures in order to derive utility-based welfare measures toward aesthetic issues. For highly controversial urban (overground) infrastructures, we propose the inclusion of an aesthetic component in cost–benefit analysis.
topic aesthetics
aesthetic measurement
Birkhoff index
hedonic price analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4977
work_keys_str_mv AT christosevangelinos thevaluationofaestheticpreferencesandconsequencesforurbantransportinfrastructures
AT stefantscharaktschiew thevaluationofaestheticpreferencesandconsequencesforurbantransportinfrastructures
AT christosevangelinos valuationofaestheticpreferencesandconsequencesforurbantransportinfrastructures
AT stefantscharaktschiew valuationofaestheticpreferencesandconsequencesforurbantransportinfrastructures
_version_ 1721500156898050048