Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation
This paper gives a computer-intensive approach to multi-step-ahead prediction of volatility in financial returns series under an ARCH/GARCH model and also under a model-free setting, namely employing the NoVaS transformation. Our model-based approach only assumes <inline-formula> <math disp...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Econometrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/3/34 |
id |
doaj-11351c33d04d42158a5cddd058168555 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-11351c33d04d42158a5cddd0581685552020-11-25T02:30:05ZengMDPI AGEconometrics2225-11462019-08-01733410.3390/econometrics7030034econometrics7030034Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS TransformationJie Chen0Dimitris N. Politis1Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USADepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USAThis paper gives a computer-intensive approach to multi-step-ahead prediction of volatility in financial returns series under an ARCH/GARCH model and also under a model-free setting, namely employing the NoVaS transformation. Our model-based approach only assumes <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> innovations without requiring knowledge/assumption of the error distribution and is computationally straightforward. The model-free approach is formally quite similar, albeit a GARCH model is not assumed. We conducted a number of simulations to show that the proposed approach works well for both point prediction (under <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> measures) and prediction intervals that were constructed using bootstrapping. The performance of GARCH models and the model-free approach for multi-step ahead prediction was also compared under different data generating processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/3/34bootstrap<i>L</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> measuresGARCH(1,1)NoVaS transformationmulti-step predictionMonte Carlo simulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jie Chen Dimitris N. Politis |
spellingShingle |
Jie Chen Dimitris N. Politis Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation Econometrics bootstrap <i>L</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> measures GARCH(1,1) NoVaS transformation multi-step prediction Monte Carlo simulation |
author_facet |
Jie Chen Dimitris N. Politis |
author_sort |
Jie Chen |
title |
Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation |
title_short |
Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation |
title_full |
Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation |
title_fullStr |
Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal Multi-Step-Ahead Prediction of ARCH/GARCH Models and NoVaS Transformation |
title_sort |
optimal multi-step-ahead prediction of arch/garch models and novas transformation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Econometrics |
issn |
2225-1146 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
This paper gives a computer-intensive approach to multi-step-ahead prediction of volatility in financial returns series under an ARCH/GARCH model and also under a model-free setting, namely employing the NoVaS transformation. Our model-based approach only assumes <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> innovations without requiring knowledge/assumption of the error distribution and is computationally straightforward. The model-free approach is formally quite similar, albeit a GARCH model is not assumed. We conducted a number of simulations to show that the proposed approach works well for both point prediction (under <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> measures) and prediction intervals that were constructed using bootstrapping. The performance of GARCH models and the model-free approach for multi-step ahead prediction was also compared under different data generating processes. |
topic |
bootstrap <i>L</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> measures GARCH(1,1) NoVaS transformation multi-step prediction Monte Carlo simulation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/3/34 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiechen optimalmultistepaheadpredictionofarchgarchmodelsandnovastransformation AT dimitrisnpolitis optimalmultistepaheadpredictionofarchgarchmodelsandnovastransformation |
_version_ |
1724830057123282944 |