Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun

When the devil writes and publishes. Literary practices as social practices in the Correspondence of Surin and the Possession of Lundun. This article analyses how Michel de Certeau uses literature as a social phenomenon on the one hand, and studies on literature on the other hand, to make room for t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Schapira
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du Littéraire 2018-03-01
Series:Les Dossiers du GRIHL
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/6902
id doaj-112796f6d4bc4fdba646239f00befa5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-112796f6d4bc4fdba646239f00befa5c2020-11-25T02:46:23ZfraGroupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du LittéraireLes Dossiers du GRIHL1958-92472018-03-012018210.4000/dossiersgrihl.6902Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de LoudunNicolas SchapiraWhen the devil writes and publishes. Literary practices as social practices in the Correspondence of Surin and the Possession of Lundun. This article analyses how Michel de Certeau uses literature as a social phenomenon on the one hand, and studies on literature on the other hand, to make room for the otherness of the past and to tackle this past without confining it in any historiography. First of all, we analyse how Certeau mobilizes the notion of "literary genre", that is to say how he uses an important tool of literary studies, though diverting it completely (in his edition of the Correspondence of Jean-Joseph Surin, a mystique, as well as in L'Ecriture de l' histoire). In this paper, we also enquire into the place of the literary phenomenon in Certeau's analysis of Loudun's possession. At the end of our study, it becomes possible to designate what would constitute for Certeau the main characteristic ‒ or one characteristic ‒ of literary practices.http://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/6902de Certeau (Michel)literary genrebook historyhistory of correspondencewriting practiceswriting of history
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolas Schapira
spellingShingle Nicolas Schapira
Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
Les Dossiers du GRIHL
de Certeau (Michel)
literary genre
book history
history of correspondence
writing practices
writing of history
author_facet Nicolas Schapira
author_sort Nicolas Schapira
title Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
title_short Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
title_full Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
title_fullStr Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
title_full_unstemmed Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun
title_sort quand le diable écrit et publie. le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de surin et la possession de loudun
publisher Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du Littéraire
series Les Dossiers du GRIHL
issn 1958-9247
publishDate 2018-03-01
description When the devil writes and publishes. Literary practices as social practices in the Correspondence of Surin and the Possession of Lundun. This article analyses how Michel de Certeau uses literature as a social phenomenon on the one hand, and studies on literature on the other hand, to make room for the otherness of the past and to tackle this past without confining it in any historiography. First of all, we analyse how Certeau mobilizes the notion of "literary genre", that is to say how he uses an important tool of literary studies, though diverting it completely (in his edition of the Correspondence of Jean-Joseph Surin, a mystique, as well as in L'Ecriture de l' histoire). In this paper, we also enquire into the place of the literary phenomenon in Certeau's analysis of Loudun's possession. At the end of our study, it becomes possible to designate what would constitute for Certeau the main characteristic ‒ or one characteristic ‒ of literary practices.
topic de Certeau (Michel)
literary genre
book history
history of correspondence
writing practices
writing of history
url http://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/6902
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasschapira quandlediableecritetpublielelitterairecommepratiquesocialedanslacorrespondancedesurinetlapossessiondeloudun
_version_ 1724758721935966208