Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair

The purpose of this article is a clarification of Heidegger`s philosophical stance on δόξα. Although it is not explicitly mentioned in his magnum opus, Being in Time, δόξα is always in the background of philosopher`s analyses of Mitsein, being-with-others, rhetoric or speech (Rede), our self-underst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Borislav Mihačević
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2020-01-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1156/article/18201/
id doaj-110318cf9e5e4e9aa54cc7cf5a50e08a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-110318cf9e5e4e9aa54cc7cf5a50e08a2021-06-18T10:05:21ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja 1734-99232020-01-015010.18276/aie.2020.50-03Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous AffairBorislav Mihačević0University of Ljubljana, Facutly of Arts, Department of PhilosophyThe purpose of this article is a clarification of Heidegger`s philosophical stance on δόξα. Although it is not explicitly mentioned in his magnum opus, Being in Time, δόξα is always in the background of philosopher`s analyses of Mitsein, being-with-others, rhetoric or speech (Rede), our self-understanding in the world, etc. Much of Heidegger`s stance toward δόξα derived from his early analyses of Aristotle and presocratic notion of ἀλήϑεια. While δόξα is in itself ambiguous, namely that is not aimed only at what is possible, contingent (πρακτá), but also what is eternal (πáντα), what cannot be otherwise, it is also true that Heidegger`s treatment of δόξα is very ambiguous. Many of Heidegger`s commentators have split views regarding the intersubjective nature of others in fundamental ontology; based on his strong anti-Cartesian Geschmack, some view it positively, others do not. In the article, I will argue for the latter in the sense that his phenomenological reflections on δόξα paradoxically led to the conclusion, which Heidegger tried to avoid, namely the hierarchy between Being and appearance.https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1156/article/18201/δόξαHeideggerBeingappearancetruthAristotle
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Borislav Mihačević
spellingShingle Borislav Mihačević
Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
Analiza i Egzystencja
δόξα
Heidegger
Being
appearance
truth
Aristotle
author_facet Borislav Mihačević
author_sort Borislav Mihačević
title Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
title_short Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
title_full Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
title_fullStr Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
title_full_unstemmed Heidegger and δόξα: an Ambiguous Affair
title_sort heidegger and δόξα: an ambiguous affair
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Analiza i Egzystencja
issn 1734-9923
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The purpose of this article is a clarification of Heidegger`s philosophical stance on δόξα. Although it is not explicitly mentioned in his magnum opus, Being in Time, δόξα is always in the background of philosopher`s analyses of Mitsein, being-with-others, rhetoric or speech (Rede), our self-understanding in the world, etc. Much of Heidegger`s stance toward δόξα derived from his early analyses of Aristotle and presocratic notion of ἀλήϑεια. While δόξα is in itself ambiguous, namely that is not aimed only at what is possible, contingent (πρακτá), but also what is eternal (πáντα), what cannot be otherwise, it is also true that Heidegger`s treatment of δόξα is very ambiguous. Many of Heidegger`s commentators have split views regarding the intersubjective nature of others in fundamental ontology; based on his strong anti-Cartesian Geschmack, some view it positively, others do not. In the article, I will argue for the latter in the sense that his phenomenological reflections on δόξα paradoxically led to the conclusion, which Heidegger tried to avoid, namely the hierarchy between Being and appearance.
topic δόξα
Heidegger
Being
appearance
truth
Aristotle
url https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1156/article/18201/
work_keys_str_mv AT borislavmihacevic heideggeranddoxaanambiguousaffair
_version_ 1721372969378250752