Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective
Taking its cue from the work of John Tzetzes (1110-1185 ca), this paper offers a preliminary survey of the role played by bureaucratic and legal training in defining autography and authorship in 12th-century Byzantium. By comparing archival practices and authorial signatures, it demonstrates that f...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
Università degli Studi di Milano
2021-03-01
|
Series: | ACME |
Online Access: | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ACME/article/view/15234 |
id |
doaj-10fadb7af6b84174837ee973b5bb3c5e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10fadb7af6b84174837ee973b5bb3c5e2021-03-13T08:53:28ZitaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoACME2282-00350001-494X2021-03-01731Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspectiveAglae Pizzone0University of Southern Denmark Taking its cue from the work of John Tzetzes (1110-1185 ca), this paper offers a preliminary survey of the role played by bureaucratic and legal training in defining autography and authorship in 12th-century Byzantium. By comparing archival practices and authorial signatures, it demonstrates that features belonging to the legal discourse could be exploited by intellectuals to reinforce and re-center their voices as well as to overcome social constraints and, at time, marginality. The paper also takes a comparative perspective, by looking at the developments of vernacular poetry in Bologna, Tuscany and Sicily between 13th and 14th century, with a focus on the work of Francesco da Barberino. The comparative stance aims to prove that entanglements between legal/bureaucratic and literary writing are a cross-cultural constant emerging due to similar educational and scribal practices, thus showing that the case of the Italian pre-humanist intellectuals is the rule rather than the exception. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ACME/article/view/15234 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Italian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aglae Pizzone |
spellingShingle |
Aglae Pizzone Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective ACME |
author_facet |
Aglae Pizzone |
author_sort |
Aglae Pizzone |
title |
Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
title_short |
Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
title_full |
Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
title_fullStr |
Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in John Tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
title_sort |
bureaucratic discourse, signature and authorship in john tzetzes: a comparative perspective |
publisher |
Università degli Studi di Milano |
series |
ACME |
issn |
2282-0035 0001-494X |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Taking its cue from the work of John Tzetzes (1110-1185 ca), this paper offers a preliminary survey of the role played by bureaucratic and legal training in defining autography and authorship in 12th-century Byzantium. By comparing archival practices and authorial signatures, it demonstrates that features belonging to the legal discourse could be exploited by intellectuals to reinforce and re-center their voices as well as to overcome social constraints and, at time, marginality. The paper also takes a comparative perspective, by looking at the developments of vernacular poetry in Bologna, Tuscany and Sicily between 13th and 14th century, with a focus on the work of Francesco da Barberino. The comparative stance aims to prove that entanglements between legal/bureaucratic and literary writing are a cross-cultural constant emerging due to similar educational and scribal practices, thus showing that the case of the Italian pre-humanist intellectuals is the rule rather than the exception.
|
url |
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ACME/article/view/15234 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aglaepizzone bureaucraticdiscoursesignatureandauthorshipinjohntzetzesacomparativeperspective |
_version_ |
1724221884086616064 |