Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse

The prominence of biomedical criteria relying on brain death reduces the impact of metaphysical, anthropological, psychosocial, cultural, religious, and legal aspects disclosing the real value and essence of human life. The aim of this literature review is to discuss metaphysical and biomedical appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irayda Jakušovaitė, Žydrunė Luneckaitė, Eimantas Peičius, Živilė Bagdonaitė, Olga Riklikienė, Edgaras Stankevičius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300234
id doaj-10ee6a3c30354e539b5fc7a926642805
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10ee6a3c30354e539b5fc7a9266428052020-11-24T21:23:12ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2016-01-0152420521010.1016/j.medici.2016.06.002Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourseIrayda Jakušovaitė0Žydrunė Luneckaitė1Eimantas Peičius2Živilė Bagdonaitė3Olga Riklikienė4Edgaras Stankevičius5Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaMedical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Nursing and Care, Faculty of Nursing, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaThe prominence of biomedical criteria relying on brain death reduces the impact of metaphysical, anthropological, psychosocial, cultural, religious, and legal aspects disclosing the real value and essence of human life. The aim of this literature review is to discuss metaphysical and biomedical approaches toward death and their complimentary relationship in the determination of death. A critical appraisal of theoretical and scientific evidence and legal documents supported analytical discourse. In the metaphysical discourse of death, two main questions about what human death is and how to determine the fact of death clearly separate the ontological and epistemological aspects of death. During the 20th century, various understandings of human death distinguished two different approaches toward the human: the human is a subject of activities or a subject of the human being. Extinction of the difference between the entities and the being, emphasized as rational–logical instrumentation, is not sufficient to understand death thoroughly. Biological criteria of death are associated with biological features and irreversible loss of certain cognitive capabilities. Debating on the question “Does a brain death mean death of a human being?” two approaches are considering: the body-centrist and the mind-centrist. By bridging those two alternatives human death appears not only as biomedical, but also as metaphysical phenomenon. It was summarized that a predominance of clinical criteria for determination of death in practice leads to medicalization of death and limits the holistic perspective toward individual's death. Therefore, the balance of metaphysical and biomedical approaches toward death and its determination would decrease the medicalization of the concept of death.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300234Brain deathBiomedical criteriaDetermination of deathMedicalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irayda Jakušovaitė
Žydrunė Luneckaitė
Eimantas Peičius
Živilė Bagdonaitė
Olga Riklikienė
Edgaras Stankevičius
spellingShingle Irayda Jakušovaitė
Žydrunė Luneckaitė
Eimantas Peičius
Živilė Bagdonaitė
Olga Riklikienė
Edgaras Stankevičius
Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
Medicina
Brain death
Biomedical criteria
Determination of death
Medicalization
author_facet Irayda Jakušovaitė
Žydrunė Luneckaitė
Eimantas Peičius
Živilė Bagdonaitė
Olga Riklikienė
Edgaras Stankevičius
author_sort Irayda Jakušovaitė
title Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
title_short Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
title_full Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
title_fullStr Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
title_full_unstemmed Determination of death: Metaphysical and biomedical discourse
title_sort determination of death: metaphysical and biomedical discourse
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The prominence of biomedical criteria relying on brain death reduces the impact of metaphysical, anthropological, psychosocial, cultural, religious, and legal aspects disclosing the real value and essence of human life. The aim of this literature review is to discuss metaphysical and biomedical approaches toward death and their complimentary relationship in the determination of death. A critical appraisal of theoretical and scientific evidence and legal documents supported analytical discourse. In the metaphysical discourse of death, two main questions about what human death is and how to determine the fact of death clearly separate the ontological and epistemological aspects of death. During the 20th century, various understandings of human death distinguished two different approaches toward the human: the human is a subject of activities or a subject of the human being. Extinction of the difference between the entities and the being, emphasized as rational–logical instrumentation, is not sufficient to understand death thoroughly. Biological criteria of death are associated with biological features and irreversible loss of certain cognitive capabilities. Debating on the question “Does a brain death mean death of a human being?” two approaches are considering: the body-centrist and the mind-centrist. By bridging those two alternatives human death appears not only as biomedical, but also as metaphysical phenomenon. It was summarized that a predominance of clinical criteria for determination of death in practice leads to medicalization of death and limits the holistic perspective toward individual's death. Therefore, the balance of metaphysical and biomedical approaches toward death and its determination would decrease the medicalization of the concept of death.
topic Brain death
Biomedical criteria
Determination of death
Medicalization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300234
work_keys_str_mv AT iraydajakusovaite determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
AT zydruneluneckaite determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
AT eimantaspeicius determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
AT zivilebagdonaite determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
AT olgariklikiene determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
AT edgarasstankevicius determinationofdeathmetaphysicalandbiomedicaldiscourse
_version_ 1725993033186410496