Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS betw...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Choe |
id |
doaj-10e3513c2c6d46c9998fb4b69895aa58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10e3513c2c6d46c9998fb4b69895aa582020-11-25T02:41:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMuller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research0975-97272019-01-01101172010.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_44_18Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypsJu-Song ChoeKwang-Ho ChoeNam-Il JiObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS between November 2016 and December 2017 with either a microdebrider or forceps. They were randomly assigned to receive either FESS with microdebrider (n = 38) or conventional endoscopic removal (n = 35). Ours is the retrospective study. Results: Seventy-three patients underwent FESS. In the series of microdebrider group, the intraoperative time and blood loss were significantly reduced compared with the one of conventional endoscopic surgeries with forceps or snares. Resection with microdebrider provided more visible surgical field than conventional endoscopic surgery. Conclusion: We found that the effectiveness and safety of FESS with microdebrider for CRSwNP was more advanced than conventional endoscopic surgery.http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=ChoeFunctional endoscopic sinus surgerymicrodebridernasal polyp |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ju-Song Choe Kwang-Ho Choe Nam-Il Ji |
spellingShingle |
Ju-Song Choe Kwang-Ho Choe Nam-Il Ji Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research Functional endoscopic sinus surgery microdebrider nasal polyp |
author_facet |
Ju-Song Choe Kwang-Ho Choe Nam-Il Ji |
author_sort |
Ju-Song Choe |
title |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
title_short |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
title_full |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
title_fullStr |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
title_sort |
functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research |
issn |
0975-9727 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS between November 2016 and December 2017 with either a microdebrider or forceps. They were randomly assigned to receive either FESS with microdebrider (n = 38) or conventional endoscopic removal (n = 35). Ours is the retrospective study. Results: Seventy-three patients underwent FESS. In the series of microdebrider group, the intraoperative time and blood loss were significantly reduced compared with the one of conventional endoscopic surgeries with forceps or snares. Resection with microdebrider provided more visible surgical field than conventional endoscopic surgery. Conclusion: We found that the effectiveness and safety of FESS with microdebrider for CRSwNP was more advanced than conventional endoscopic surgery. |
topic |
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery microdebrider nasal polyp |
url |
http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Choe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jusongchoe functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps AT kwanghochoe functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps AT namilji functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps |
_version_ |
1724777718334095360 |