Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ju-Song Choe, Kwang-Ho Choe, Nam-Il Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Choe
id doaj-10e3513c2c6d46c9998fb4b69895aa58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10e3513c2c6d46c9998fb4b69895aa582020-11-25T02:41:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMuller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research0975-97272019-01-01101172010.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_44_18Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypsJu-Song ChoeKwang-Ho ChoeNam-Il JiObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS between November 2016 and December 2017 with either a microdebrider or forceps. They were randomly assigned to receive either FESS with microdebrider (n = 38) or conventional endoscopic removal (n = 35). Ours is the retrospective study. Results: Seventy-three patients underwent FESS. In the series of microdebrider group, the intraoperative time and blood loss were significantly reduced compared with the one of conventional endoscopic surgeries with forceps or snares. Resection with microdebrider provided more visible surgical field than conventional endoscopic surgery. Conclusion: We found that the effectiveness and safety of FESS with microdebrider for CRSwNP was more advanced than conventional endoscopic surgery.http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=ChoeFunctional endoscopic sinus surgerymicrodebridernasal polyp
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ju-Song Choe
Kwang-Ho Choe
Nam-Il Ji
spellingShingle Ju-Song Choe
Kwang-Ho Choe
Nam-Il Ji
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery
microdebrider
nasal polyp
author_facet Ju-Song Choe
Kwang-Ho Choe
Nam-Il Ji
author_sort Ju-Song Choe
title Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
title_short Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
title_full Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
title_fullStr Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
title_full_unstemmed Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
title_sort functional endoscopic sinus surgery with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
issn 0975-9727
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with microdebrider for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated surgical procedures of patients with CRSwNP who underwent FESS between November 2016 and December 2017 with either a microdebrider or forceps. They were randomly assigned to receive either FESS with microdebrider (n = 38) or conventional endoscopic removal (n = 35). Ours is the retrospective study. Results: Seventy-three patients underwent FESS. In the series of microdebrider group, the intraoperative time and blood loss were significantly reduced compared with the one of conventional endoscopic surgeries with forceps or snares. Resection with microdebrider provided more visible surgical field than conventional endoscopic surgery. Conclusion: We found that the effectiveness and safety of FESS with microdebrider for CRSwNP was more advanced than conventional endoscopic surgery.
topic Functional endoscopic sinus surgery
microdebrider
nasal polyp
url http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Choe
work_keys_str_mv AT jusongchoe functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps
AT kwanghochoe functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps
AT namilji functionalendoscopicsinussurgerywithmicrodebriderforchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolyps
_version_ 1724777718334095360