Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries

Objective – An investigation of the use of teams in technical services, provision of training on team-working, characteristics of technical services teams, and the effectiveness of teams. Design – Survey comprising of 19 closed questions and one open question. Setting – Technical services...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kirsty Thomson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2012-06-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/16571
id doaj-10e089287be14627a0855e95792cbd23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10e089287be14627a0855e95792cbd232020-11-24T21:48:59ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2012-06-017210.18438/B8360RTeams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic LibrariesKirsty Thomson0University Library, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh, Scotland, United KingdomObjective – An investigation of the use of teams in technical services, provision of training on team-working, characteristics of technical services teams, and the effectiveness of teams. Design – Survey comprising of 19 closed questions and one open question. Setting – Technical services departments in academic libraries. Subjects– Responses were received from 322 library staff members. Of those, 294 answered the survey question about team-based technical services and 55.9% of respondents completed the full survey. Methods – An online survey was promoted via seven technical services electronic mail lists and was conducted using SurveyMonkey. Main Results – The survey found that 39% of technical services were entirely team-based, 18% were partly team-based, and 43% did not use teams. Information was gathered about the number of teams, team nomenclature, and how long teams have been used. This research highlighted the lack of provision of training and documentation about working in teams. Conclusion – Many respondents have team-based technical services, and most participants found that working in teams had a positive impact. A systematic application of this survey is planned for the future.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/16571
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirsty Thomson
spellingShingle Kirsty Thomson
Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
author_facet Kirsty Thomson
author_sort Kirsty Thomson
title Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
title_short Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
title_full Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
title_fullStr Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
title_full_unstemmed Teams Are Now Used by Many Technical Services Departments in Academic Libraries
title_sort teams are now used by many technical services departments in academic libraries
publisher University of Alberta
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
issn 1715-720X
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Objective – An investigation of the use of teams in technical services, provision of training on team-working, characteristics of technical services teams, and the effectiveness of teams. Design – Survey comprising of 19 closed questions and one open question. Setting – Technical services departments in academic libraries. Subjects– Responses were received from 322 library staff members. Of those, 294 answered the survey question about team-based technical services and 55.9% of respondents completed the full survey. Methods – An online survey was promoted via seven technical services electronic mail lists and was conducted using SurveyMonkey. Main Results – The survey found that 39% of technical services were entirely team-based, 18% were partly team-based, and 43% did not use teams. Information was gathered about the number of teams, team nomenclature, and how long teams have been used. This research highlighted the lack of provision of training and documentation about working in teams. Conclusion – Many respondents have team-based technical services, and most participants found that working in teams had a positive impact. A systematic application of this survey is planned for the future.
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/16571
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstythomson teamsarenowusedbymanytechnicalservicesdepartmentsinacademiclibraries
_version_ 1725890227681099776