Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study
Background Guidelines and Class 1 evidence are strong factors that help guide surgeons’ decision-making, but dilemmas exist in selecting the best surgical option, usually without the benefit of guidelines or Class 1 evidence. A few studies have discussed the variability of surgical treatment option...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rambam Health Care Campus
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/36/784/manuscript |
id |
doaj-10e064d7e1a5497a9aa616960ddba733 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10e064d7e1a5497a9aa616960ddba7332020-11-25T01:19:20ZengRambam Health Care CampusRambam Maimonides Medical Journal2076-91722018-01-0191e000310.5041/RMMJ.10324Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative StudyCaroline Gunaratnam0Mark Bernstein1Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaBackground Guidelines and Class 1 evidence are strong factors that help guide surgeons’ decision-making, but dilemmas exist in selecting the best surgical option, usually without the benefit of guidelines or Class 1 evidence. A few studies have discussed the variability of surgical treatment options that are currently available, but no study has examined surgeons’ views on the influential factors that encourage them to choose one surgical treatment over another. This study examines the influential factors and the thought process that encourage surgeons to make these decisions in such circumstances. Methods Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 32 senior consultant surgeons, surgical fellows, and senior surgical residents at the University of Toronto teaching hospitals. An e-mail was sent out for volunteers, and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic analysis using open and axial coding. Results Broadly speaking there are five groups of factors affecting surgeons’ decision-making: medical condition, information, institutional, patient, and surgeon factors. When information factors such as guidelines and Class 1 evidence are lacking, the other four groups of factors—medical condition, institutional, patient, and surgeon factors (the last-mentioned likely being the most powerful)—play a significant role in guiding surgical decision-making. Conclusions This study is the first qualitative study on surgeons’ perspectives on the influential factors that help them choose one surgical treatment option over another for their patients.https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/36/784/manuscriptPatient safetysurgerytraining |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Caroline Gunaratnam Mark Bernstein |
spellingShingle |
Caroline Gunaratnam Mark Bernstein Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Patient safety surgery training |
author_facet |
Caroline Gunaratnam Mark Bernstein |
author_sort |
Caroline Gunaratnam |
title |
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study |
title_short |
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study |
title_full |
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr |
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making—A Qualitative Study |
title_sort |
factors affecting surgical decision-making—a qualitative study |
publisher |
Rambam Health Care Campus |
series |
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal |
issn |
2076-9172 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Background
Guidelines and Class 1 evidence are strong factors that help guide surgeons’ decision-making, but dilemmas exist in selecting the best surgical option, usually without the benefit of guidelines or Class 1 evidence. A few studies have discussed the variability of surgical treatment options that are currently available, but no study has examined surgeons’ views on the influential factors that encourage them to choose one surgical treatment over another. This study examines the influential factors and the thought process that encourage surgeons to make these decisions in such circumstances.
Methods
Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 32 senior consultant surgeons, surgical fellows, and senior surgical residents at the University of Toronto teaching hospitals. An e-mail was sent out for volunteers, and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic analysis using open and axial coding.
Results
Broadly speaking there are five groups of factors affecting surgeons’ decision-making: medical condition, information, institutional, patient, and surgeon factors. When information factors such as guidelines and Class 1 evidence are lacking, the other four groups of factors—medical condition, institutional, patient, and surgeon factors (the last-mentioned likely being the most powerful)—play a significant role in guiding surgical decision-making.
Conclusions
This study is the first qualitative study on surgeons’ perspectives on the influential factors that help them choose one surgical treatment option over another for their patients. |
topic |
Patient safety surgery training |
url |
https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/36/784/manuscript |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolinegunaratnam factorsaffectingsurgicaldecisionmakingaqualitativestudy AT markbernstein factorsaffectingsurgicaldecisionmakingaqualitativestudy |
_version_ |
1725138899207979008 |