Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869-1948), popularly addressed as Mahatma strove hard to blur out the dialectics of the ‘personal’ (private) and the ‘political’ (public). Tridip Suhrud in Rediscovering Gandhi has argued that a divide between the ‘political’ and the ‘spiritual’ has been the hallmark of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harshit Nigam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sarat Centenary College 2018-07-01
Series:PostScriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies
Subjects:
UPA
Online Access:http://postscriptum.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pS3.iiHarshit.pdf
id doaj-10de715066194834832194d837cb6b70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10de715066194834832194d837cb6b702020-11-25T00:44:41ZengSarat Centenary CollegePostScriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies2456-75072018-07-013ii819210.5281/zenodo.1318952Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of PoliticsHarshit NigamMohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869-1948), popularly addressed as Mahatma strove hard to blur out the dialectics of the ‘personal’ (private) and the ‘political’ (public). Tridip Suhrud in Rediscovering Gandhi has argued that a divide between the ‘political’ and the ‘spiritual’ has been the hallmark of the entire academic scrutiny on Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. However, the ‘personal’ and the ‘political’ nuances of Gandhi have not been acknowledged within the Bombay Filmdom until the late 1990s. Gandhi was accorded a saintly status after independence and it became a formidable task to animate him on to the celluloid screen. Contrary to this, there has been an instantaneous enticement towards Gandhi in the ‘multiplex era’ which simultaneously coincides with the leadership of United Progressive Alliance and its endorsement of ‘Bharat-Nirman’ agenda. This paper will attempt to examine the ideologies behind the recent hype on Gandhi both as a ‘subject’ and ‘pedagogue’ in Bombay Cinema, and the possible nexus between mainstream politics and the cinematic imagination. More specifically, by carrying out a socio-political study of a set of select films, this paper would assert that an attempt has been made through the celluloid to aestheticize Gandhi which not only obliterate the ground realities of the Indian socio-democratic structure, rather more significantly do a disservice to Gandhi himself who was in favor of maintaining a ‘dialogical’ attitude towards the ‘self’ as well as with the ‘others’.http://postscriptum.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pS3.iiHarshit.pdfUPAnation-buildingdemocracymultiplexesdialogic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harshit Nigam
spellingShingle Harshit Nigam
Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
PostScriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies
UPA
nation-building
democracy
multiplexes
dialogic
author_facet Harshit Nigam
author_sort Harshit Nigam
title Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
title_short Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
title_full Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
title_fullStr Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
title_full_unstemmed Bharat Nirman and the Aestheticization of Politics
title_sort bharat nirman and the aestheticization of politics
publisher Sarat Centenary College
series PostScriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies
issn 2456-7507
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869-1948), popularly addressed as Mahatma strove hard to blur out the dialectics of the ‘personal’ (private) and the ‘political’ (public). Tridip Suhrud in Rediscovering Gandhi has argued that a divide between the ‘political’ and the ‘spiritual’ has been the hallmark of the entire academic scrutiny on Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. However, the ‘personal’ and the ‘political’ nuances of Gandhi have not been acknowledged within the Bombay Filmdom until the late 1990s. Gandhi was accorded a saintly status after independence and it became a formidable task to animate him on to the celluloid screen. Contrary to this, there has been an instantaneous enticement towards Gandhi in the ‘multiplex era’ which simultaneously coincides with the leadership of United Progressive Alliance and its endorsement of ‘Bharat-Nirman’ agenda. This paper will attempt to examine the ideologies behind the recent hype on Gandhi both as a ‘subject’ and ‘pedagogue’ in Bombay Cinema, and the possible nexus between mainstream politics and the cinematic imagination. More specifically, by carrying out a socio-political study of a set of select films, this paper would assert that an attempt has been made through the celluloid to aestheticize Gandhi which not only obliterate the ground realities of the Indian socio-democratic structure, rather more significantly do a disservice to Gandhi himself who was in favor of maintaining a ‘dialogical’ attitude towards the ‘self’ as well as with the ‘others’.
topic UPA
nation-building
democracy
multiplexes
dialogic
url http://postscriptum.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pS3.iiHarshit.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT harshitnigam bharatnirmanandtheaestheticizationofpolitics
_version_ 1725274093213712384