La posibilidad de la justicia global. Sobre los límites de la concepción estadocéntrica y las probabilidades de un cosmopolitismo débil
This paper presents objections to the critique of cosmopolitanism made by Rawls and Nagel who defend a concept of justice in which justice and sovereignty are closely related. The first part presents Rawls's rhetorical strategy which is opposed to the cosmopolitan idea of transforming the inter...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad de los Andes
2013-08-01
|
| Series: | Revista de Estudios Sociales |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://res.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/855/index.php?id=855 |
| Summary: | This paper presents objections to the critique of cosmopolitanism made by Rawls and Nagel who defend a concept of justice in which justice and sovereignty are closely related. The first part presents Rawls's rhetorical strategy which is opposed to the cosmopolitan idea of transforming the international order based on the demands of global economic justice. The second part covers Nagel's position which is opposed to the idea of global justice. The final section introduces Christina Lafont's presentation of a model of international policy that is geared toward justice in a global context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0123-885X 1900-5180 |